The imminent threat of having Tony Fernandez around you is “YOU” would not know when “YOU” will be eaten alive by him.

The actual truth of Tony Fernandez having bought and owned Queen Park Rangers is to get close to the world’s richest Asian descent i.e. Lakshmi Niwas Mittal.

Lakshmi Niwas Mittal  is an England-based Indian steel magnate. He is the chairman and CEO of ArcelorMittal, the world’s largest steelmaking company. Mittal owns 41 percent of ArcelorMittal and holds a 34 percent stake in the Queens Park Rangers F.C. football team.

Mittal is the richest man of Asian descent. Despite being the wealthiest man in Britain, he does not hold British citizenship. He was ranked the sixth richest person in the world by Forbes in 2011, but dropped to 21st place in 2012, due to having lost $10.4 billion the previous year. In spite of the drop, Forbes estimates that he still had a personal wealth of US$16 billion in October 2012. He is also the 47th “most powerful person” of the 70 individuals named in Forbes’ “Most Powerful People” list for 2012.

His daughter Vanisha Mittal’s wedding was the second most expensive in recorded history.

Mittal has been a member of the board of directors of Goldman Sachs since 2008, and is also member of the board of directors of the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company. He sits on the World Steel Association’s executive committee, and is a member of the Indian Prime Minister’s Global Advisory Council, the Foreign Investment Council in Kazakhstan, the World Economic Forum’s International Business Council, and the Presidential International Advisory Board of Mozambique. He also sits on the advisory board of Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management in the United States and is a member of the board of trustees of the Cleveland Clinic.

In 2006 The Sunday Times named him “Business Person of 2006″, the Financial Times named him “Person of the Year”, and Time magazine named him “International Newsmaker of the Year 2006″.  In 2007, Time magazine included him in their “100 most influential persons in the world”.

As Mittal is one of the most important business men in India; Tony Fernandez has planned ahead to use Mittal in expanding his Tune Group empire into India by luring two Indian rich investors i.e. Ratan Tata and Arun Bhatia to invest in Air Asia X – Chennai based India.

As AirAsia seeks approval to start operations in India, it can pose a threat to local low-fare carriers. AirAsia Bhd has submitted an application to the Indian government seeking approval to start domestic operations.

How will Air Asia’s entry affect Indian aviation?

After establishing joint ventures in Indonesia, Thailand, Japan and Philippines, the Malaysia-based AirAsia Bhd has submitted an application to the Indian government seeking approval to start domestic operations. As per the proposal, the airline’s investment arm AirAsia Investment Ltd will hold 49% in the proposed Indian joint venture with Tata Sons Ltd (30%) and Arun Bhatia of Telestra Tradeplace Pvt Ltd (21%). This move comes in the backdrop of the September decision by the Indian government to open up the aviation sector to foreign direct investment from foreign airlines.

How big is the threat?

Apart from AirAsia being the leading and largest low-cost carrier in Asia, the cost structure of the airline is the lowest in the world. According to local airlines’ representatives, AirAsia’s cost is at least 30% lower than Indian low-fare carriers because of low-cost terminals in other countries, cheaper jet fuel and other advantages.

With this huge cost advantage alone, AirAsia can give local low-fare carriers—IndiGo, SpiceJet Ltd and GoAir—a run for their money. Full-service carriers such as Jet Airways (India) Ltd and Air India will also feel the heat. Also, AirAsia chairman Tony Fernandes is known for unleashing Rs.1 fare from Mumbai to Kuala Lumpur.

J.P. Morgan Securities Singapore Pvt. Ltd’s analyst Corrine Png, in a note on 21 February, wrote AirAsia’s India entry is negative for Indian airlines, especially SpiceJet, given its major presence in Chennai and exposure in smaller cities. “With traffic under pressure, it would be challenging to sustain higher yields. The entry of new players could put pressure on pricing,” Png wrote.
On a conference call last week, Fernandes said it would not opt for 70-seater planes at any point and it will stick to Airbus A320 planes that have around 200 seats each. India has around 40 runways where such big planes can land. This would mean that AirAsia’s proposed Indian venture would add pressure to crowded routes, although the carrier is known for flying to smaller cities.

What can go wrong in AirAsia’s strategy?

According to a note by consultancy firm CAPA, the AirAsia brand has entered nine Indian markets since late 2008 but has had to drop three, including Mumbai and Delhi, because of lack of profitability and high airport costs in India. But AirAsia’s Fernandes is unperturbed. He says he has done his homework to stay low cost before finalizing the proposal.

So how immediate is the AirAsia threat?

AirAsia has plans to start operations with three to four planes. The smallest low-fare carrier GoAir has 13 planes. So it will take some to scale up. More importantly, AirAsia has just applied for the permission with Foreign Investment Promotion Board.

It has to seek an air operating permit. The aviation ministry is in no mood to give permission to import planes, so issuing a fresh licence would take some more time. The ministry is also concerned about the financial health of domestic airlines as two of them—Kingfisher Airlines Ltd and Paramount Airways—were grounded. This would mean it will take around a year for the threat to materialize.

Next – How AirAsia luring Tata Group and Arun Bhatia and struck the deal in Bombay?

Stay tuned to Malaysiaairlinesfamilies JV with AirAsiafamilies for more information on Tony Fernandez the Scumbag – The King of Drug lord and The Pirates.

In early 2011, AirAsia’s Tony Fernandes was waiting to meet officials in the civil aviation ministry in New Delhi for talks on starting flights to India from Kuala Lumpur. On the wall of the room he was waiting in was a poster of J.R.D. Tata, founder of Air India. He says he sent a text to Tata group chief Ratan Tata: “This is a sign, let’s do it.” Fernandes had met J.R.D. Tata’s successor as Tata group chief at a Formula 1 race in 2005.

Fernandes recalled, in a phone interview from London, the events that led up to Wednesday’s announcement about the joint venture plan with the Tata group and Telestra Tradeplace Pvt. Ltd. Edited excerpts:

What was Ratan Tata’s reply to the text message?

He was very keen about it. He knew AirAsia, he saw what we had done in the market. He obviously had a passion for aviation and all the stars aligned at the right time.

Both partners have a sporting background also. I met Mr Tata through the Formula 1 business. When Tata was a sponsor, Narain and I made contact with Mr Tata (Tata group sponsored race driver Narain Karthikeyan for F1 in 2005). When the Indian government started liberalizing, I talked to him straight away. I said, look it’s time we look at this and I can’t think of anyone else I would like to do this with. That was six months back.

In the last six months since the government opened up foreign direct investment (in India’s airlines by overseas carriers), you made several trips to India and tweeted about your excitement regarding the Indian market. How did those trips go?

All the times I have come to India, I was kind of teasing a bit because at all times you were in discussion on this. And the driver (he hired in India) made the biggest impact on me.

This man took 40 hours to get from Madras to Delhi in a train and we were talking about fares (as he drove him around for meetings in Delhi) and how much he would pay to fly and that gave me the confidence to change many people’s lives in India and really create a product which could really be low-cost and make an impact.

Did you meet Ratan Tata at Bombay House?

I have met him in various places and yes Bombay House is one of them.

But yes, when I finally presented it to the Tata Sons board, it was in Bombay House. It was about two months ago.

There’s some speculation that since L.N. Mittal’s family is connected to the Bhatias of Telestra, the deal was sealed when you were at the World Economic Forum meetings in Davos.

No. It was sealed before. It was a pure sporting deal. Its QPR (Queens Park Rangers, the UK football club that Fernandes owns) on one side Caterham (British sportscar maker and F1 team owned by Fernandes) on the other side. Both were the links to my partners in India. (Arun Bhatia’s son Amit Bhatia is the son-in-law of ArcelorMittal’s L.N. Mittal and serves on the board of directors at QPR club alongside Fernandes.)

And you are not buying Kingfisher?

No. My whole life has been about organic growth. Never say never, but we have generally grown organically because of cultural reasons etc. So, Kingfisher definitely not, I mean (it’s) too far down the wire, I think.

How has the reaction to the announcement been?

We have got an amazing response. The Indians are very excited about it. It’s something I am very proud of, it’s something that’s been long in the making. Obviously, I am of Indian origin so it makes it that much more special. My father, Stephen Fernandes, was an Indian from Goa and mother Ena Fernandes was a Malaysian from south India. I think we couldn’t have found better partners, which is the most exciting thing of this venture. To partner with the Tatas and to partner with the Bhatia family is something very special, I think. We have studied this market for a long, long time so this is not something we have jumped into and I feel we can produce a product at the right cost structure which will then give the right fare to really stimulate the Indian market and create some real economic growth in the Indian market.

When is AirAsia India likely to start services?

I think it depends on all the approvals but I hope sometime this year.

What’s the vision that you and the Tata group have for the airline two years down the line?

I am never good at that. If you would ask me a few years ago, when I started AirAsia, we had all these planes, we just ploughed on. But vision? Take India, one step at a time. It’s important. India is too big a country to try and do everything. We will take India one step at a time. We will do region by region. Our main vision is a lot of new routes, a lot of connectivity that’s not been done before.

That’s only flights within India?

Yes only within India. We are not allowed (to fly on international routes) until the laws are changed, so we will be only focused on domestic. (Indian rules require an airline to complete five years of domestic operations before starting overseas flights.

Will AirAsia India have only Airbus A320s or ATRs also?

No ATRs. Only A320.

So it will be a pure-play, low-fare airline?

Yes, it would be.

Stay tuned for more updates from malaysiaairlinesfamilies who were once the victim of Tony Fernandez and airasiafamilies who are the worst paid workers in Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia and Philippines. In AirAsia, the workers are far treated like peasants doing all dirty cleaning for Tony Fernandez for free. Read here on how Air Asia treated its workers.

LONG-STANDING:

The Philippines’ claim on Sabah has remained unresolved for nearly 50 years, writes Dr Paridah Abd Samad;

THE level of irritation in the relationship between Malaysia and the Philippines is considered unnatural for two immediate neighbours who belong to a common regional grouping. The Philippine’s claim on Sabah, one of Malaysia’s 13 states, is an issue that has remained unresolved for nearly 50 years.

Once a part of the Sultanate of Sulu, Sabah’s land area exceeds 29,000 square miles, smaller than neighbouring Mindanao by about 8,000 square miles. Its centuries-old ties with the Philippines are indicated by the fact that inhabitants of both came from the same racial stock and have similar customs and traditions.

The Sultan of Brunei originally ruled this part of Borneo, but in 1704, the Sultan of Sulu helped suppress an uprising there and, as a reward, North Borneo was ceded to Sulu. Subsequently, Europeans came to Southeast Asia for the valuable minerals, spices, and other rich sources of revenue, and in 1878, two of these enterprising merchants leased North Borneo from the sultan. Soon the British North Borneo Company was formed and awarded a royal charter.

In the course of laying the groundwork for Philippine independence, the treaty signed in 1930 by the US government and the British Crown, circumscribed the territorial jurisdiction of the Philippine Republic. It did not include Sabah within the boundaries of Spanish, American, or Philippine jurisdiction.

Six days after the Philippines was granted independence (July 10, 1946), the British North Borneo Company turned over all its rights and obligations to the British government, which in turn asserted full sovereign rights over Sabah through the North Borneo Cession Order.

There was no advancement of Philippine claims to Sabah from 1946 to 1962. Within that period, successive Philippine administrations conducted low-keyed investigations on the merits of such a claim, and a study of these and other documents convinced Diosdado Macapagal, then chief of the Legal Division of the Philippines’ Foreign Affairs Department, that a claim on North Borneo could be filed.

The first official Philippine act on the matter — House Resolution No. 42 adopted on April 28, 1950 — stated explicitly that North Borneo belonged to the heirs of the Sultan of Sulu and authorised the president to conduct negotiations for the restoration of sovereign jurisdiction.

But it was June 1962 before the Philippine government notified the United Kingdom of its claim on Sabah, and the following December the two agreed to hold talks on the issue. The promulgation of the claim brought the Philippines into diplomatic conflict with the British, who regarded it as a nuisance in relation to their own plan to change the status of North Borneo from a colony into a state of an expanded federation of Malaysia. The British government rejected the Philippine position in view of the overriding need to form the Federal Republic of Malaysia, ostensibly to contain communism in Southeast Asia.

Meanwhile, since Sabah has a total land area of 74,398 square kilometres and is only 16km from Sulu, it was a Philippine security concern. Such concerns, may have moved President Macapagal on April 20, 1963 to write to President John F. Kennedy stressing the importance of North Borneo as vital to the security of the Philippines.

At the first ministerial conference on the claim, held in London in 1963, a joint communiqué was issued by the foreign ministers of Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines stating that the inclusion of North Borneo in the Federation of Malaysia “would not prejudice either the Philippine claim or any right thereunder”. This joint statement was ratified by the leaders of the three countries when they met later that year in Manila, and Macapagal’s participation in it, jeopardised the Philippine claim to Sabah.

In any case, the Federation of Malaysia came into being on September 16, 1963, and due to the physical possession of Sabah by Malaysia, the Philippine government refused to accord diplomatic recognition, contrary to its solemn commitment in the Manila Agreement. When Soekarno started his “confrontation” against Malaysia, Manila reduced its representation in Kuala Lumpur to consular level.

The claim was relegated to the sidelines when it became entangled within the wider context of the Republic of Indonesia’s “confrontation” with Malaysia and the Sukarno regime’s threat to resort to military means to crush the fledgling nation. Upon termination of the confrontation, the dispute over Sabah was carried to Bangkok, where bilateral negotiations aimed at its resolution were abruptly aborted. In the United Nation’s General Assembly, the disputants exchanged contentious charges and countercharges.

Various unsuccessful efforts were made to reconcile Philippines and Malaysia until the two finally agreed to restore full diplomatic relations in June 1966. Ironically, President Ferdinand Marcos recognised the formation of Malaysia, after he took over political power in the Philippines.

With the inception of the five-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean), there was a tacit agreement between Malaysia and the Philippines that the issue be shelved in the interest of regional solidarity, and they agreed that it should be finally resolved through Asean.

In March 1967, the Philippine government was invited to send observers to witness the first direct elections in Sabah, but Manila refused on the ground that this might prejudice its position on the claim. The refusal did not, however, impede the participation of the Philippines and Malaysia in the formation of Asean in August 1967, and the following January President Marcos and his wife paid a state visit to Kuala Lumpur.

But deterioration in bilateral ties, again involving Sabah, led to a rupture in relations in 1969. The Philippines’s institutionalisation of the claim through enactment of Republic Act 5546, incorporating Sabah as part of the territory of the Philippines, triggered Malaysian suspension of diplomatic ties. However, in the spirit of regional cooperation, relations were restored on Dec 16, 1969, during Asean’s third ministerial conference.

Written by : Dr Paridah Abd Samad is a former lecturer at UiTM Shah Alam and IIUM Gombak

Tomorrow: PART II of this article.

Sabah Chief Minister of Sabah, Mr. Donald Stephens (second from left), in national Kadazan costume, being sworn into office by the Chief Justice at the Malaysia proclamation ceremony in Jesselton, Sabah, on Sept 17, 1963. On the right is the Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister Tun Abdul Razak Hussein, representing the central Federal Government.

Malaysiaairlinesfamilies see the target is the present Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak because his father was the former deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia (above bare right) who represented the central Federal Government of Malaysia in 1963. Coincides with the upcoming Malaysia 13th General Election; there is no doubt the opposition leaders may have been behind the curtain planning Sulu invasion to suppress the voters in Sabah particularly the Suluk Community that have been very loyal to the Yang DiPertuan Agung and the State Federal Government helm by the present Prime Minister of Malaysia – Najib Tun Razak.

Those opposition supporters still speculating behind the ruling coalition for defending the country responsibly and preserving a peaceful nation for Malaysians as we write by spreading false rumors accelerating the tension between the opposition parties and voters – please go and eat BABI’s shit and lick the whole affair as you like till its cleaned-up!

We see BABI is so desperate to be the next Prime Minister of Malaysia but today is the history of BABI in Malaysia politic. BABI is entirely wiped out from Malaysia map because BABI has Sulu’s bloodline; a manipulator par excellence so skilled that he can convince several hundred fighters from Sulu to die for his cause so to be the next Malaysia Prime Minister.

Read Reuters – Sabah Politician allied with Anwar met Sulu Sultan before Lahad Datu standoff.

Read also Malaysia Insiders – 10 reasons why BABI is behind the Sulu saga.

Stay tuned for Part II of this article.

We are taking a short break on researching Air Asia’s fraud to focusing on Malaysia’s intrusion by former President Marcos of Philippines that had recruited 300 Sulu trained army just for terrorising the Sabahan. Next post – The tale of two airlines – Espisode 2.

This article is written by Dr. Paridah Abd Samad;

INITIATIVE: Philippine leaders have, since Marcos, taken the effort to resolve the sovereignty issue; THEN Philippine president Ferdinand Marcos made a dramatic move towards normalisation of bilateral relations in 1976, just prior to an Asean summit meeting, when he stated that the Philippines no longer intended to press its claim to sovereignty over Sabah, though he did not officially drop it. The pronouncement, however, was never followed by any concrete action.

The dispute dragged on into the Corazon Aquino administration, which tried to resolve the problem through revising legal and constitutional provisions to drop the claim. The Philippine Constitution of 1987 no longer includes the phrase “by historical and legal rights” as part of the definition of the national territory. Also, Senate Bill No. 206, redefining the archipelagic boundaries of the Philippines, called for amendments to Republic Acts 5546, and it particularly excluded Sabah from Philippine territory.

However, Sultan Jamalul Kiram III’s denouncement of Aquino’s government for endorsing the bill without consulting him and bungling by the newly installed administration kept the bill from getting through the Senate, denying Aquino a diplomatic victory of the Asean summit in December, 1987.

The Philippines cannot just drop its claim to Sabah to patch up differences with Malaysia, as it must first consider the repercussions of such a decision on the politically unstable Sulu Archipelago. Sabah and Moro are interrelated in prolonging settlement of the dispute and in deepening the security concerns of the Philippine government.

The transmigration of mostly Filipino Muslim refugees to Sabah has put the Philippines in a favourable position because this has significantly contributed to reducing the Muslim population ratio and its resistance strength.

In 1970, Tunku Abdul Rahman played an important role in promoting international support for the Moro cause. As secretary-general of the Organisation of Islamic Countries (now Organisation of Islamic Cooperation), he endorsed the Moro case submitted to him in 1972 and asked King Faisal of Saudi Arabia and (Libyan) president (Muammar) Gaddafi to help in persuading other OIC member states to support it.

But Malaysia’s optimism and hope for a new and brighter chapter in Malaysia-Philippines relations remain unfulfilled. While the Aquino administration made the effort and took the initiative to drop the sovereignty claim on Sabah, it was unable to push through its initiative because of stumbling blocks. Senate Bill 206, which excludes Sabah from Philippine territory, remains unenacted.

Since no law has yet been passed on the dropping of Sabah claim, the Philippine government still has the option to actively pursue the claim through internationally accepted norms. By pursuing the claim, the Philippine government could promote the Philippines’ historic rights and legal title over Sabah, as well as the proprietary rights of the heirs of sultan of Sulu.

However, the 1930 treaty between the United States and Great Britain drew a precise boundary to separate their island possessions off the northeast coast of Sabah. The allocation of islands defined in these treaties was enshrined in Article 1 of the Philippine Constitution of 1935.

The Philippine claim has no known international support while Malaysia is morally supported by Great Britain and the Commonwealth of Nations in rejecting this claim. Even the US has assumed a position of neutrality. The other Asean countries, though discreetly distancing themselves form the issue since it involves two of their fellow members, also seem to silently acknowledge Malaysia’s right to the disputed territory.

For the Philippines to drop its claim to Sabah without concessions would mean outright recognition of Malaysia’s sovereignty over Sabah. Taking this position might also jeopardise the proprietary rights of sultan of Sulu. In general, choosing this option appears to be damaging the national integrity.

Malaysia gave a solemn commitment to satisfactorily resolve the proprietary claim with recognised Sulu heirs once the sovereignty claim is legally and finally dropped. It sees no linkage whatsoever between the two claims. Malaysia has always insisted that sovereignty and proprietary rights over Sabah are two separate questions.

It is hoped that President Benigno Aquino will resolve the Sabah issue amicably. AP pic

The writer is a former lecturer of UiTM Shah Alam and International Islamic University Malaysia, Gombak.

Malaysiaairlinesfamilies and AirAsiafamilies – Many Malaysians are still in the dark of the history on Sabah claims – However; do Malaysians still think BABI doesn’t know this or does he know much early when BABI met with the rebels of Sulu (AP picture)?

Read this – An Autonomous Sabah promised by BABI if he becomes the next Malaysia Prime Minister.  The rebel in the picture with BABI declared war is imminent if Malaysia kills his fake Sultan Jamalul Kiram III’s brother.

The self-proclaimed Sultan Jamalul Kiram III

The descendants of the Sulu Sultanate have condemned self-proclaimed Sultan Jamalul Kiram III for instigating violence in Sabah.

Mudarasulail Kiram who is the son of the late Sultan Mahakuttah Kiram, and fellow claimant to the Sulu throne Sultan Bantilan Muhammad Muizzuddin II condemned Jamalul for putting the lives of the Tausug people in danger for his selfish agenda.

They called on their countrymen to immediately retreat and stop following the orders of Jamalul as he was not the real Sultan of Sulu.

It is wrong and un-Islamic to terrorise Sabah, especially as Malaysia has never oppressed the Tausug community, said Mudarasulail.

“Our target should be the Philippine Government which has oppressed us for so long,” he added.

Stressing that Sabah rightfully belonged to Malaysia, Mudarasulail said the Tausug community in the state risk being victimised because of Jamalul’s actions.

He also called on the self-proclaimed sultan to stop using the name Jamalul, as people like him who perpetrate violence should not use the sacred names of former sultans.

He said Jamalul had proclaimed himself sultan despite not being the biological grandson of Sultan Mawalil Wasit (who was the designated Sulu sultan after Sultan Jamalul Kiram II who did not have any direct heirs).

He who has the history of bankrupting and DE-listing a private corporate company – Malakoff Corporation Berhad; who successfully and viciously terminated thousands of workers during his tenure with Malakoff Corporation Berhad; and he who had declared for Malaysia Airlines the first massive losses of RM2.52 billion during the share swap and collaboration framework with Air Asia.

WE believe MAS present CEO is either incompetent or intentionally collaborating with Tony Fernandez of Air Asia to save Air Asia from bankruptcy at the expense of Malaysia Airlines by giving away MAS routes to Air Asia terminating Johannesburg that generated 80% of revenue for Malaysia Airlines; Dubai that generated almost 95% of revenue for Malaysia Airlines and Haneda that merely started to generate revenue for Malaysia Airlines. He fails in his fiduciary duty recovering the loss of MAS routes from Air Asia. The longer he sits as MAS CEO position; the more routes will be lost to Air Asia through his plannings. His claims were those routes were not profitable and bleed MAS to dry and by contrast he has granted Air Asia many opportunities to open new routes into those routes MAS had lost under the corporate leadership of Ahmad Jauhari – a.k.a. The Clueless CEO. The truth is Ahmad Jauhari secretly approved the giving away of Johannesburg, Dubai, Haneda and Taipei for Air Asia.

Ahmad Jauhari has been lying to his workers of the performance of Malaysia Airlines and we caught his evil collaboration with Tony Fernandez and proxies i.e. Azahari Dahlan and Zahrah Zaid for fixing up the workers from the inside of Malaysia Airlines.

Let us brief the public the ingredients to destroy Malaysia Airlines by Tony Fernandez’s proxies;

1. Ahmad Jauhari’s special skill is to shrink the operation; DE-listing the corporation like what he did to Malakoff Corporation Berhad and planting more corporate espionage of Air Asia into Malaysia Airlines establishing the platform of insecurity for the workers. His plans were to DE-list Malaysia Airlines and possibly bankrupt it at one ringgit value for Tony Fernandez to buy over. His best performance is playing PRETENTIOUS GAME with MAS workers seemingly portray a good man with vision to save Malaysia Airlines. Time for Ahmad Jauhari to tender his resignation as soon as possible or face the invincible wrath – FIRED and HUMILIATED.
2. Azahari Dahlan will work on recruiting Air Asia’s loyal workers into Malaysia Airlines Aerospace Engineering with intention to sabotage Malaysia Airlines’ aircraft where he successfully responsible for engines on fire and emergency landing. His further mission is to ensure Air Asia’s aircraft could be serviced for FREE on the house when Air Asia sends all of its Airbus aircraft for major overhaul maintenance this coming August 2013. The last head of division in MAE had responsibly asked for CASH TRANSACTION from Tony Fernandez; was terminated by Ahmad Jauhari.
3. Zahrah Zaid’s mission is to crush the workers’ rights and fixing the workers for fast termination. She is to break up all MAS unions and associations before her contract ends with MAS. Whilst she sat as the director for MAS Human Resource Division; she quickly fixed the remuneration for the top management using the budget that was meant for the workers and today she had her salary hiked up 150% from RM40,000 right up to RM100,000. Read here for more information on Zahrah Zaid’s infamous history.

The TRIO have planned well for fixing all the workers using their available sources, relatives and connection. Especially Ahmad Jauhari – he has a relative working as Deputy Director  of Anti-Corruption Agency to frame up those who were against the collaboration with Air Asia with the help from NUFAM, NUFEM (that is yet to be formed) and NUFOAM (that is under way to be formed).

Tony Fernandez desperately wanted Malaysia Airlines more than any other businesses. He sees MAS as a very SEXY LADY and wishes to re-marry MAS through the Malaysian tycoon – Syed Mokthar Al-Bukhari buying over Malaysia Airlines. Syed Mokthar Al-Bukhari does not have the expertise to run Malaysia Airlines and we believe he is being used by Tony Fernandez to purchase Malaysia Airlines from the ladies in RED.

However, in this Episode 2; you will learn the comparison on the performance between Malaysia Airlines and Air Asia where Malaysia Airlines’ shares is expected to rise up to RM8.50 than of Air Asia’s shares which has more limitation in ratio of profit to value and cash return on investment.

MORGAN & STANLEY analyzed on prospective F2008 P/BV, both MAS and Air Asia are trading at undemanding multiples of 1.2-1.3x, comparable to the Tier-1 airlines multiple of 1.3x. We do not look at P/E multiple as Air Asia’s earnings are boosted by deferred income tax credit, and contribute to the low artificial P/E multiple.

Investment Conclusions. Morgan and Stanley conclude with three investment observations.

• Closing the Efficiency Gap. We believe MAS has successfully restructured its business model and has a new business transformation plan to grow operating revenues. By focusing on delivering value to passengers and cargo/MRO customers and taking out non-essential costs, MAS is building a lean cost structure to compete more effectively with low-cost airlines and the regional network airlines. Air Asia, which viewed MAS as a non competitive threat in the past because of its gross operational inefficiency, is now re-defining its product to create added-value services to compete with MAS. The net impact is the operational efficiency gap between the two airlines has narrowed significantly over the past two years, as highlighted by the operating and pretax margin trends (see Exhibit 2).
• Sharp Divergence in Cash Position. MAS raised its cash reserve through a rights and loan stock issue last year and had accumulated a cash position of RM5.3 billion at December 2007. In a very tight liquidity credit market, MAS had net cash of RM4.4 billion while Air Asia had net debt of RM3.3 billion at December 2007. As funding costs start to rise with increasing credit default risk, we think Air Asia’s plans to seek to fund its aggressive capital expenditures of RM2-3 billion for the next five years might encounter difficulties in a tough credit market. In F2008, we estimate Air Asia would need to raise about RM3 billion to fund the estimated capital expenditure of RM2.8-3.0 billion, whereas we estimate MAS’ capital expenditure would not be more than RM1.0 billion.
• Potential Derivative Losses. We are particularly concerned about Air Asia’s fuel hedging position. We view the directional bet on oil positions via its sold call options – currently exposed on its F2009 and F2010 oil positions – as potential derivative losses that could severely undermine the company’s cash flow to service both the interest and fixed contractual payments. If WTI oil prices remain above US$90/bbl for the next two years, the underlying operational losses, and more importantly, reduced cash flow generation for Air Asia could have a substantial impact on its franchise value. In contrast, MAS has adopted a conservative fuel hedging strategy whereby it will benchmark its hedging ratio to the average hedging ratio of the Asian airlines to reduce oil volatility.

On a risk-reward tradeoff for the Malaysian aviation sector, we believe MAS shares offer much better risk-adjusted upside potential than Air Asia shares, and we recommend investors switch from Air Asia to MAS. Given MAS’ franchise value of less than 1.0x EBITDA, we believe MAS is attractively valued for deep-value investors.

Buy MALAYSIA AIRLINES And Sell Air Asia

Morgan Stanley research on Air Asia

Investment Thesis

• Tough corporate restructuring builds a strong platform for MAS to compete effectively with the top airlines in Asia.
• Active yield management drives up operating revenues and enhances operating margin.
• Falling oil prices boost near-term earnings and contribute to positive earnings surprises.

Key Value Drivers

• Network rationalization enhances operational efficiency and load factors.
• Focus on profitable routes and maximize yield to enhance value for shareholders.
• Surplus cash reinvested for earnings growth to enhance shareholder value.

Potential Catalysts

• Yield surprise. Higher fares achieved despite lowering fuel surcharges due to active yield management.
• Positive earnings surprise could arise from Airbus compensation, falling oil prices, or higher yields.
• Jet fuel prices below US$95/bbl would lower MAS’ operating costs to 31% vs. 34% currently, and substantially improve net earnings.

Key Risks

• Slower global GDP growth. If US and global economies slow significantly, the weak global travel outlook would be negative for the carrier.
• Threat of low-cost airlines. If LCCs aggressively lower fares to increase market share, MAS and other airlines would likely cut their own fares to protect leisure passenger segments.
• Strong competition from Gulf carriers. Gulf carriers are expanding their fleets aggressively to take advantage of open skies in Asia. Long-haul routes at risk for MAS.

Investment Thesis

• Low-cost airlines (LCCs) in Asia have the potential to increase passengers at a CAGR of at least 20% for the next five years, by our estimates.
• Air Asia has the first-mover advantage in the LCC industry, and the carrier has built a proven and successful LCC business model in Asia.
• If WTI crude oil prices stay above US$90/bbl in 2009 and 2010, Air Asia would be exposed to substantial derivative fuel contract losses and lack of cover for the high jet fuel prices, and this could lead to negative earnings surprises.

Key Value Drivers

• Factors driving the high LCC growth are liberalization of ASEAN and Asian skies, doubling of aircraft orders by Asian LCCs in four years, and low market penetration by LCCs in the Asia/Pacific market.
• High operating earnings CAGR supports high EV/EBITDA, and is a key support for Air Asia’s share price, in our view.

Potential Catalysts

• Fast track in ASEAN aviation liberalization.

If ASEAN skies are liberalized ahead of the 2008 deadline, we see additional regional cities as an upside option for the carrier.

• Network route rationalization.

We see significant incremental growth potential from the domestic and international routes, particularly from capacity expansion to India and China, two of the fastest-growth aviation markets in the world.

Key Downside Risks

• Restructured and recharged Malaysia Airlines (MAS).

We think the revamped national carrier could prove to be a formidable competitor to Air Asia. Impact of high fuel surcharges on underlying fares. The higher ticket fares, which incorporate the increased fuel surcharges, could have negative implications for passenger travel.

• Inflated equity.

We think net equity for Air Asia was inflated by 30% at June 2007, and possibly by about 35-40% for the next 2-3 years, due to mounting deferred tax credits and deferred associate losses on the balance sheet.

Malaysiaairlinesfamilies will continue to expose Ahmad Jauhari’s illegal activities inside Malaysia Airlines – so Ahmad Jauhari better equip with battalion or leave before your are fired and arrested.  You shall continuously declaring profits for Malaysia Airlines and promoting MAS shares transparently.

Stay tuned for more updates on Tony Fernandez is making a comeback to Malaysia Airlines using MAS gullible workers and the billionaire tycoon.

This article is reprinted for our readers’ update on the Sabah crisis – Even if the broke Sultan Sulu wanted to reclaim it after 70 years of rents to Malaysia – still people of Malaysia whom are also the Suluk Community and now the Sabahan residence would not want the BROKE Sultan Sulu to rule the state.

Ask anyone? Who wants to be ruled under a BROKE Sultan who lives in a run down two store-y house? We want to know if the BROKE Sultan Sulu is educated or uneducated? The self-proclaimed PRINCESS – if caught really; anyone please slap her 1000 times on our behalf. Our gratitude in advance.

“Did Brunei actually give Sabah to the Sulu Sultanate?” From OutSyed the Box.

I received the following Brunei Times article from A. Sharizal Jimin  who said :FYI. Food for thought. Obtained it from the Brunei Times. If true, this effectively flushes down the loo all claims by the Sulu’s (and the Philippines). I’m reproducing the article below.Regards,

A. Sharizal Jimin

Here is the article:

THE 1968 Programme Book for the Coronation of His Majesty Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Muizzaddin Waddaulah as the 29th Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan of Brunei Darussalam, had two interesting documents inserted inside. The documents were reproduction of two treaties taken from microfilm kept at the Public Record Office in London.

The first treaty was signed by Brunei’s 24th Sultan, Sultan Abdul Momin, appointing Baron de Overbeck as the Maharaja Sabah, Rajah Gaya and Sandakan signed on 29th December 1877.

The second treaty was signed by Sultan Jamalalulazam of Sulu appointing Baron de Overbeck as Dato Bendahara and Raja Sandakan on 22nd January 1878, about three weeks after the first treaty was signed.

That begs the question: Who was responsible for Sabah or North Borneo as it was known then towards the end of the 19th century? That probably has a bearing on the event now unfolding in Lahad Datu in Sabah, where a group of armed men supposedly from the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo is claiming that they are the rightful owners of Sabah.

Many of the early modern accounts of written history in Brunei noted that Sulu was given possession of Sabah or parts of Sabah for help rendered to Sultan Muhydin, the 14th Sultan of Brunei who fought a civil war against the 13th Sultan of Brunei, Sultan Abdul Mubin.

Sultan Abdul Mubin usurped the throne after killing Sultan Muhammad Ali when the latter tried to stop Sultan Abdul Mubin from taking his revenge for the death of his son killed by the son of Sultan Muhammad Ali.

Sultan Abdul Mubin appointed Sultan Muhydin as Bendahara but eventually Sultan Muhydin tricked Sultan Abdul Mubin into leaving Brunei for Pulau Cermin and appointed himself as the new Sultan of Brunei.

The two Sultans fought against each other and Sultan Muhyidin finally triumphed, said to be due to the assistance provided by the Sulu Sultanate.

Sir Hugh Low, writing in the Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society (JSBRAS) published on 5 June 1880 entitled ‘Selesilah (Book of Descent) of the Rajas of Bruni’, wrote that “by the assistance of a force from the Sultan of Soolok, the forts on the island (Pulau Cermin) were captured”.

Earlier Sir Hugh Low described the negotiation between Sulu and Brunei: “the Bataraa of Soolok went up to Bruni and met the Sultan Muaddin and having feasted and drank, the Sultan asked the Batara for his assistance to destroy the enemies at the island, promising that if the island should be conquered, the land from the North as far as westward as Kimani should belong to Soolook”.

HR Hughes-Hallett writing in the Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society published in August 1940 entitled A Sketch of the History of Brunei wrote: “by the beginning of the 18th century, the kingdom (Brunei) had been territorially diminished by the cession to the Sultan of Sulu in the north”.

CA Majul in his book Muslims in the Philippines (1973) referred to a letter from Sultan Jamalul Azam of Sulu to the Governor General of Spain on 17 September 1879 that the coast area from Kimanis to Balikpapan was to pay tribute to the Sultan which he said proved that the Brunei territory facing Suluk was ceded to Suluk.

Interestingly enough, Pehin Jamil Umar writing in his book, Tarsilah Brunei II: Period of Splendour and Fame (2007), countered all of the above. Pehin Jamil did not deny the fact that the Sulus were invited and promised the northern Brunei territory by Sultan Muhydin if they helped him win the civil war against Sultan Abdul Mubin.

However, during the battle for Pulau Cermin, the Sulu forces who were supposed to attack the island from Pulau Keingaran and from the sea, did not do so. They were terrified by the resistance of Sultan Abdul Mubin’s forces in Pulau Cermin. It was only after Sultan Muhydin had won the battle did the Sulu forces landed and took the opportunity to seize a number of war booties.

According to Pehin Jamil, Sultan Muhydin refused to cede the territories claimed by Sulu. Pehin Jamil noted that the area was only “claimed” and not “ceded”, as Sir Stamford Raffles, in his book “History of Java” (1830), had noted “on the north-east of Borneo proper (Brunei) lies a very considerable territory (Sabah), the sovereignty of which has long been claimed by Sulu Government”.

Pehin Jamil further noted that according to the oral tradition, Sulu continued to press their claim. In 1775, one of their chiefs came to Brunei pretending to seek fresh water. What they really wanted was to seek an audience with the Sultan regarding Sabah. However, the Sultan ordered one of the chief wazirs to see them and he threatened that if they wanted to pursue their intention, he will kill them all. The Sulus immediately left. Despite that setback, the Sulus continue to maintain their claims.

The argument that Brunei has not ceded Sabah to Sulu is supported by LR Wright in her book The Origins of British Borneo (1970). She wrote: “indeed, the legitimacy of the Sulu claim to the territory (North Borneo) is in considerable doubt partly because of the unreliability of tarsilas such as ‘Selesilah’, which in many cases are nothing more than written-down legends to enhance the status of the royal house which produced them.

Succeeding Sultans of Brunei have denied that northern Borneo was given to Sulu, and only the weight of Sulu tradition supports the claim. The weight of Brunei tradition challenges it”.

The Sulu claim is currently resting on that treaty which was mentioned at the beginning of this article signed by Sultan Jamalalulazam of Sulu appointing Baron de Overbeck as Dato Bendahara and Raja Sandakan on 22nd January 1878.

But at the beginning of this article, there is, in fact, another treaty which was signed earlier by Sultan Abdul Momin appointing Baron de Overbeck as the Maharaja Sabah, Rajah Gaya and Sandakan signed on 29th December 1877. In 1877, the Brunei Sultanate then still believed and maintained that the territory was in fact still under the control of the Brunei Sultanate.

Another interesting document is the British North Borneo Treaties Protocol of 1885 signed in Madrid, which is also known as the Madrid Protocol of 1885, a copy of which can be found on Sabah State Attorney General’s website. It was signed by the British, Germany and Spain who was the predecessor government of the Philippines.

The two most important articles are Article I British and Germany recognizing the sovereignty of Spain over the Sulu Archipelago and Article III Spain relinquishing all claims to Borneo.

Next post – How Tony Fernandez cheats his customers and the investors?

By James Hooway from Wall Street Journal

The Royal Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo isn’t much to look at. It’s a two-story house in a ramshackle Manila neighborhood where beggars jostle for sidewalk space with elderly ladies selling baskets of dried fish and teenagers running photocopier stalls.

James Hookway/The Wall Street Journal

Jamalul Kiram III, the 74-year-old self-declared Sultan of Sulu, has made a centuries-old claim to the Malaysian state of Sabah.

But this is the operations hub for Jamalul Kiram III, the 74-year-old self-declared Sultan of Sulu whose audacious attempt to enforce his family’s centuries-old claim to the Malaysian state of Sabah has so far claimed over 70 lives, and put his tiny kingdom at the center of Asia’s confusing and deadly mosaic of overlapping territorial claims.

“Everybody knows I’m the rightful owner of Sabah. All we want is for Malaysia to recognize it, too,” Mr. Kiram said during a break in discussions with supporters here recently.

Wearing a bright sarong and a grubby “I Love Kuala Lumpur” T-shirt, he explained that he doesn’t really want to govern Sabah. Rather, he says he just wants the same status accorded to other sultans in Malaysia, such as the Sultan of Johor or Sultan of Perak – and some money to help him lead a royal lifestyle.

So, last month Mr. Kiram dispatched around 200 followers, many of whom were heavily armed, to make the short hop from his ancestral stamping grounds in the Sulu archipelago of the southern Philippines to Malaysia-controlled Borneo.

Celia Kiram, the self-declared sultan’s wife, signs for the receipt of a subpoena from the Philippines’ National Bureau of Investigation to help with their inquiries.

After a lengthy stand-off in a coastal village, Malaysian security forces launched air strikes and sent in ground troops to flush out the intruders. In the following days, 62 Filipinos, nine Malaysian security personnel and one civilian were killed in clashes while governments in Kuala Lumpur and Manila scrambled to contain the political fallout in both countries. Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak, with an election due soon, said he had to act swiftly to protect Malaysia’s territorial integrity, and many of the Kiram family’s supporters are still on the run in Sabah as Filipino prosecutors wonder whether they can charge Mr. Kiram with violating any Philippine laws.

As bizarre as all this seems, Mr. Kiram’s quest isn’t as Quixotic as claiming to be the rightful monarch of, say, France.

The Royal Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo is in a ramshackle Manila neighborhood.

Despite having no formal political power, the Sultanate of Sulu commands considerable respect among many Muslim Filipinos. In the past, it helped unify warring tribes in the fractious southern Philippines. The family also believes it has a legitimate claim to Sabah, after the Sultan of Sulu granted the territory to the Kirams in 1704 in return for helping to crush a rebellion, and the Philippine government has never fully relinquished its claim, either.

Looking on at the carnage from his crumbling Manila home, Mr. Kiram reckons his mission has partly succeeded. Among other things, the Sabah invasion has helped put his family’s claim back on the international map alongside other disputes, such as a border row between Thailand and Cambodia and China’s tussles with Vietnam and other countries over which nation controls parts of the South China Sea.

The Philippine government, meanwhile, says it is now examining how it can revive the Sabah claim peacefully. “I have a responsibility to dissect history in search of these truths, and from there, to lay down the direction that our country will take as regards Sabah – a direction that I guarantee you will not involve the use of violence,” President Benigno Aquino III said Monday.

And as far as Mr. Kiram is concerned, it’s not a moment too soon.

Family members say Mr. Kiram is running out of time. He undergoes kidney dialysis at least twice a week at a cost of $120 per session. The 5,300 ringgit, or about $1,700, that the Malaysian government pays his family each year in an archaic form of rent doesn’t come close to covering it, and his poor health is depleting his savings.

His siblings are also aging – an important consideration given that the line of royal succession in the Sulu sultanate passes from brother to brother like in Saudi Arabia, rather than father to son, as in Britain. The brother commanding the Sabah invasion and now on the run, for instance, is 70-year-old retired woodwork teacher Agbimuddin Kiram.

“A lot of us want to see something happen now before it is too late,” says Celia Kiram, the sultan’s wife. “We’ve made proposals to Malaysia and to Malacanang,” she said, referring to the Philippines’ presidential palace. “But nothing has happened.”

A succession of governments in the Philippines has struggled with the Kiram family’s claim to Sabah. In 1902, American writer George Ade wrote a comic opera called “The Sultan of Sulu” that poked fun at the U.S.’s efforts to govern its new colonial possession after winning the islands from Spain in 1898. The musical revolved around Sultan Jamalul Kiram I’s colorful appetites, including his clumsy attempts to woo the schoolmarms sent by U.S. President William McKinley to help educate the islanders about American ways.

In 1915, Sultan Jamalul Kiram II abdicated his formal powers, and in 1963 Sabah, which the Kiram family had leased to the British North Borneo Company, was formally folded into modern-day Malaysia – enraging the Kiram family for generations to come.

The modern-day Philippine government has occasionally raised the claim to Sabah, too. In 1968, former president Ferdinand Marcos hatched a plan to train Muslim soldiers to invade and annex Sabah, but it was aborted when the recruits rebelled. Dozens were massacred.

Last year, current President Benigno Aquino III appeared to put the dispute to bed by describing the country’s claim to Sabah as dormant. Malaysia, meanwhile, helped broker a breakthrough peace agreement between the Philippine government and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front, the largest of the Muslim rebel groups operating in the south of the predominantly Christian Philippines.

Those events raised fears among senior members of the Kiram family that Manila would relinquish the Philippines’ claim to Sabah, and also sideline the clan from a new power structure forming in the chaotic islands of the southern Philippines that would be dominated by the Islamic Front.

But by making an armed invasion of Sabah, some members of the Kiram clan fear Mr. Kiram has blown the family’s chances of getting a settlement, as well as complicating life for some 800,000 Filipinos who live and work in the state, who now fear being viewed by Malaysian security forces as potential collaborators with the intruders.

“This isn’t going to help. It will only harden attitudes,” says Muedzil Lail Tan Kiram, Mr. Kiram’s cousin, who also claims to be the legitimate Sultan of Sulu.

It looks like the Sultanate of Sulu will lose to Malaysia in their ownership fight over Sabah.

The cards are stacked up against the family of the ailing 74-year-old Sultan Jamalul Kiram III:

• Malaysia is in physical control of that disputed 73,630-square-kilometer corner of Borneo that it rents from the sultanate for P70,000 a year. Occupation means 99.99 percent of winning the case.

• Malaysia’s vastly superior forces — dominating the sea, land and air — are hunting down with deadly ferocity the ragtag “royal forces” of the sultanate that have been reduced to less than 200 guerillas on the run.

• In a 1963 referendum sponsored by the United Nations under the principle of self-determination, majority of Sabah residents reportedly elected to stay with Malaysia.

• Kiram family members themselves do not agree on what route to take.

• And President Aquino appears to have taken the side of Malaysia. That clinches it.

But the Kirams are not likely to go down alone. President Aquino, his senatorial Team PNoy and the entire country are bound to suffer collateral damage.

If the President is not able to work out before May a resolution mutually satisfactory to Kuala Lumpur and the sultanate, that could mean:

• Goodbye to a Bangsamoro sub-state for the Moro Islamic Liberation Front replacing the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao created for the Moro Islamic Liberation Front.

• Also goodbye to that dream that the Bangsamoro deal would end the strife in Mindanao and inspire Mr. Aquino’s nomination for a Nobel Peace Prize.

From the time he started scolding the Kirams in public, telling them to surrender unconditionally and face the law, President Aquino hardly had any word of comfort or assurance for them.

On the contrary, the President and his spokesmen are sometimes caught mouthing the same lines as Malaysia Prime Minister Najib Razak and his foreign minister.

Last time he spoke on the subject, at the Philippine Military Academy, the President said, correctly, that the “complicated” dispute cannot be resolved by force of arms but by peaceful dialogue.

However, it is important that the Kirams and the government get together, move in a common direction and face Malaysia with one voice.

But how can this happen when the Kirams cannot agree among themselves, while the President and his boys sound almost like Kuala Lumpur’s spokesmen?

Sen. Miriam Santiago, incoming member of the International Criminal Court, suggested that the Philippines and Malaysia appoint a third party to conduct “inquiry and fact-finding” on the fighting in Sabah.

Under the 1907 Hague Convention for the Pacific Settlement of Disputes, she said, these peaceful options can be used to resolve disputes by clarifying the facts through an “impartial and conscientious investigation.”

According to her, “the method of inquiry and fact-finding does not involve the investigation or application of the rules of law.”

She added that “under international law, impartial fact-finding facilitates peaceful settlement of disputes, particularly settlement by negotiation, mediation, good offices, or conciliation.”

DIPLOMATIC PROTECTION

Santiago underscored the urgency of the government giving “diplomatic protection” to Filipinos in distress.

There is an unwritten exception to the prohibition on the use of force, she said, such as when a state acts to protect or rescue its nationals in the territory of another state.

But before the Philippines can undertake rescue operations in Sabah, she said the government must observe these conditions:

1. The life of Filipinos should be genuinely in danger and Malaysia is unwilling or unable to ensure their safety.
2. The Philippines does not pursue any other purpose during the rescue.
3. The scale and effects of the military force used are adequately suited to the purpose and conditions of the operation.

It is obvious, however, that even with the above conditions, President Aquino’s ordering a rescue is out of the question, given his frame of mind.

SABAH IS A LEASE

The 1878 Deed over Sabah executed by the Sulu sultan in favor of two Europeans is described as a “deed of pajak,” meaning lease.

Santiago said that since it was a lease, the sultan never transferred sovereignty to the Europeans, who later formed the British North Borneo Co., which transferred sovereignty to the British crown and then to Malaysia.

“Since no transfer of sovereignty was involved in the 1878 Deed, no transfer of sovereignty has ever passed to Malaysia,” she said.

The senator quoted statements of the British foreign minister at the time, Lord Granville, that sovereignty remained in the Sulu sultan.

This week would see a disastrous opportunity for Mr. Lipas man a.k.a. Mr. President of NUFAM on annihilating a group of innocent MAS Cabin Crew whom have zero ideas of what NUFAM is brewing. NUFAM IS A HOAX. A strategy formed by Zahrah Zaid – MAS Human Remains Director to destroy the workers’ in entirety. Zahrah Zaid works secretly for Tony Fernandez – Malaysia Airlines must be cautious with her movement and planning for its workers due Zahrah’s action may destroy MAS images.

Our previous posting here – Part I provided some insight on NUFAM plans on cheating MAS Cabin Crew via its so-branded “NUFAM SECRET BALLOT“.

NUFAM – National Union Flight Attendant Malaysia is brewing plans sabotaging huge employment opportunities for many innocent MAS Cabin Crew who only seek decent employment and security with Malaysia Airlines.

The planning between Zahrah Zaid and Mr. Lipas man were cooked on getting rid of 500 to 1,800 cabin crew in Malaysia Airlines and reducing their benefits; terms and conditions altogether.

Malaysia Airlines has been serving the public as National Carrier for the past 40 years. We find it very cruel to have such a huge organization allowing the imported proxies of Tony Fernandez sitting on top of the management ruling the workers who have contributed their entire life building this National Carrier whilst the imported proxies are tasked to cease the workers’ tenure of employment with Malaysia Airlines.

This week, Nufam, in a notice posted on its website and a copy made available to StarBiz, said: “Nufam will stage a full public protest against the Human Resources Ministry over the delay of the MAS Nufam secret ballot.” The day has been set for March 28, the time; 1pm, and the place; the entrance and courtyard of the Human Resources Ministry. MORE read HERE.

ZAHRAH ZAID the evil woman has another anti-union double agent – Mohd Fauzi Mahayadin aiding and abetting her in assisting NUFAM providing Mr. Lipas man the most confidential document belonged to Malaysia Airlines whilst instigated NUFAM to protest outside Ministry of Human Resource before the upcoming General Election is held to embarrass the Prime Minister.

This planning was reported already in the pipe-line laid by all NUFAM Executive Union Officers collaborated with Zahrah Zaid and her double agent last year in 2012.  The staging of protest is to push for the Ministry of Human Resource particularly its deputy cougar Minister Maznah Mazlan for her gavel to end the conflict on NUFAM secret ballot for MAS Cabin Crew.

Despite knowing the wrong is with the deputy Minister of Human Resource – Maznah Mazlan when approving NUFAM; there’s nothing much for the Ministry of Human Resource to correct the wrong doing conducted by his deputy.

As a matter of fact; Mazlan Maznah who have been reportedly meeting Tony Fernandez have been providing assistance to NUFAM for its attempt penetrating into Malaysia Airlines as stakeholders representing Tony Fernandez’s views and policies.

One of the policies from Tony Fernandez is to cease all traveling privileges for MAS workers in exchange for the workers to opt for Air Asia staff and family scheme and all MAS terms and conditions would drastically be arranged in parallel to Air Asia’s present terms and conditions for its Cabin Crew if NUFAM is to take the lead in negotiation for MAS Cabin Crew.

Whilst MASEU the in-house union for MAS Cabin Crew might not keep too quiet about NUFAM interference in its negotiation process; have ignored the whine and cry that does nothing for MAS workers.

We are updated NUFAM have no track records on achieving improvement for MAS Cabin Crew accept for disuniting among its members and non-members. Of late; NUFAM have been forcing some young MAS Cabin Crew harassing them for signing up as members and paying upfront of up to RM400 per sign-up for two memberships fees.

NUFAM have also sought the assistance from the Director of Trade Union Affairs – Mustafar Bin Ali and Roslee Sabaruddin for special advice on staging the picket outside the building of MOHR at 1 pm on 28th March 2013.

This warning of protest by NUFAM only serves as drama for doing something for its NUFAM members. Our reliable informants alerted Malaysiaairlinesfamilies that the protest by NUFAM on 28th March 2013 is a hoax as it will be cancelled on that morning due all NUFAM Executive Union Officers will be providing excuses away for work and running errands; on sick leave or in hospital seeking treatment or even “late attendees” their name should be.

In the meantime, we are well-informed NUFAM “trashing forum” would be updating all lies and flies buzzing around the bush to keep its members spirit high and strong. Strangely, how is it possible for a National Carrier to have employed such crooks sabotaging Malaysia Airlines’ images particularly when Malaysia Airlines has just joined ONEWORLD ALLIANCE.

Stay tuned to our updates from Malaysiaairlinesfamilies. We are currently investigating more stories on Tony Fernandez and his scammy businesses and his conceiving tactics luring investors into buying his bankrupting business – Air Asia.

A story about the BUDGET CEO – Tony Fernadez goes to a Budget Pub…

“Spare a thought for Uncle Tony Fernandez, Chief Executive of Air Asia”……

Arriving in a hotel in KL Sentral he went to the bar and asked for a pint of draught Guinness. The barman nodded and said, “That will be RM1 please, Uncle Tony.”

Somewhat taken aback, Uncle Tony replied, “That’s very cheap,” and handed over his money.

“Well, we try to stay ahead of the competition”, said the barman. “And we are serving free pints every Wednesday evening from 6 until 8. We have the cheapest draught in Asia. Now Everyone Can Drink!”

“That is admirable and your drink a remarkable value”, Uncle Tony comments, smiling delightedly.

“I see you don’t seem to have a glass, so you’ll probably need one of ours. That will beRM3 please.”

Uncle Tony scowled, but paid up. He took his drink and walked towards a seat.

“Ah, you want to sit down?” asked the barman. “That’ll be an extra RM2. You could have pre-book the seat and it would have only cost you a Ringgit.”

“I think you may to be too big for the seat Sir. Could you sit in this one please?”

Uncle Tony attempts to sit down but the seat is also too small and when he can’t squeeze in he grumpily complains “Nobody would fit in that little seat!”

“I’m afraid if you can’t fit in the seats we have you’ll have to pay an extra surcharge of RM4 to sit in one of our adjustable luxury hotseats, Sir.”

Tony swore under his breath, but paid up.

“I see that you have brought your laptop with you” added the barman. “And since that wasn’t pre-booked either, that will be another RM3.”

Uncle Tony was so annoyed that he walked back to the bar, slammed his drink on the counter, and yelled, “This is ridiculous, I want to speak to the manager!”

“Ah, I see you want to use the counter,” says the barman, “that will be RM2 please.”

Uncle T’s face was red with rage.
“Do you know who I am?”
“Of course I do. You are Mr Fernandes.”

“I’ve had enough. What sort of hotel and bar is this? I come in for a quiet drink and you treat me like this. I insist on speaking to your manager!”

“Here is his e-mail address, or if you wish, you can contact him between 9 and 9.10 every morning, Monday to Tuesday at this free phone number. Calls are free, until they are answered. Then there is a talking charge of only 10 sen per second provided you use our Hotel Tunes Talk. Using any other mobile carriers would incur our normal charges of 30 sen per second.

“That’s preposterous! It’s impossible to even complain like this! I will never use this bar again.”

“OK Uncle, it’s up to you. You are free to use or not to use this bar. But remember, we are the only bar in Asia selling pints for RM1. Now Everyone Can Drink”.

Now here is the story of Tony Fernandez cheats his potential investors published in our next Episode – Stay tuned for exciting news and secret recipe of Tony Fernandez’s success in his scams saving his little AirAsia from bankruptcy status.

The hard-work saving Air Asia has had Tony Fernandez resorted from budget airlines to swindling airlines earning him a title – Tony Fernandez the flying plunderer.

Tony Fernandez was born on 30 April 1964 from a very poor family whose mother was a single mother and a Tupperware entrepreneur who sold ice to Eskimo. Guessed that’s how Tony Fernandez learned his dexterity from his mother – Ena Fernandez.

Saving AirAsia was a sudden twist of business strategy deplorably transformed the infamous Tony Fernandez The Flying Plunderer into swindling the public of their hard-earned money via AirAsia misleading concept on NO-Frills Low Cost Airfares that can cost even more than an ordinary airfares of any Full Service Airlines.

After wrapping up a deal with Arun Bhatia and TATA group; Tony Fernandez went ahead to close another deal with Philippine counterpart just to save his little Air Asia from the tale of shrinking tower that everybody is talking about in Indonesia and Malaysia. Tony Fernandez in his tweet above admitted how amazing he has survived so far!

For Tony Fernandez who did not even know his own biological father became cruelly ambitious has been carefully editing and re-editing his latest information made available on his Wikipedia section erasing his previous unsuccessful collaboration with Malaysia Airlines to cover his blow-back and continue the investment opportunity with TATA group in India scamming his next survivability using TATA group’s most influential investors and resources.

TATA group is known of its very influential public figure, a very generous employer and an important investors in India who have every power to kick start another aviation for India.

Today, TATA group has landed with the conman of AirAsia infamously known as Tony Fernandez The Flying Plunderer will take off with AirAsia X for Chennai based.

TATA group has no idea how Tony Fernandez can swindle in and out with his sweet-talks taking the advantage to penetrate into TATA and its empire if Tony Fernandez has successfully owned AirAsia X by another 20% to 30% of holding shares.

It is evidently related that Tune Group is sinking when Tony Fernandez is eying at TATA’s empire knowing TATA group have very kind and generous employer – which mean easily conned and swindled over through a closer partnerships.

Tony Fernandez is a drug addict who relies on the drugs to deliver his goals and without it; Tony is not 100% functional. He thinks by speculating the partnerships whether he can eat you to the maximum. The partnerships that will not be successful with Tony Fernandez is when you slice him slowly and alive. Before the end of the partnerships; Tony Fernandez will fly out faster than you can imagine.

His first con-step is always manipulating the stock markets like how he rigged MAS’s shares where MAS shares plunged whilst AirAsia rose overnight.

Before he ventures into getting TATA and Arun Bhatia closed up a deal with AirAsia; Tony Fernandez engaged in his QPR games tried getting his acquaintance to bet on QPR whilst he bet the opposite knowing QPR is premier losing league. Each QPR lost game helped Tony Fernandez topping up his shares and rose as high as RM3.00 to win TATA group and Arun Bhatia’s or his next victim’s attention.

Once the deal is wrapped up successfully; AirAsia shares usually may drop to RM2.68 and lower with lowest hit was RM2.21> followed by his tweets announcing falsely on quick-growing of Air Asia’s domestic market shares. At the time of his announcement via his tweet; AirAsia’s shares was dropping quick.

Do stay tune to Malaysiaairlinesfamilies JV AirAsiafamilies for more stories on Tony Fernandez’s scammy business.

Saving Malaysia has been this month’s campaign by the Malaysian bloggers exposing the dark side of Anwar Ibrahim a.k.a. BABI – Brother Anwar Bin Ibrahim who desperately wanted to become the next Prime Minister of Malaysia. This BABI would do anything above the laws even inciting hatred, war and racism among the complex Malaysians’ multicultural ethnics.

Some say when a person is so desperate to win no matter by what means, will naturally become bias in his thinking and would unwittingly possess clouded judgment where his notoriety then draws huge publicity. You know what we mean!

The future of all Malaysians now is a lot at stake presumably be falling into the hands of IMF – International Monetary Fund which BABI had tried bringing into Malaysia since 1998. The history of Malaysia’s worst recession started back in 1998 where a JEW business man also a closet politician known as George Soros was trying to gain entry into Malaysia economy via stock speculations. George Soros at that time had sought the collaboration with BABI to contain Malaysia from progressing freely in the world of strong economy.

Today, the vicious cycle is now repeated by BABI once again. The truth behind George Soros attempted invasion into Malaysia strong economy is the attraction on the recession-proof program that Najib Tun Razak has been endorsing after decades long of well-researched by his economists team. (ooops..should we stop telling the truth?)

Malaysia today may have found the recession-proof strategy that could ostensibly indicated by the state of its current unemployment rate which still falling below 3.5%. The success of Najib Tun Razak’s administration is to contain the wildest unemployment rates allowing the citizens of Malaysia to be productive despite the current recession in domino stages worldwide.

Looking at this chart below which indicated the ongoing recession worldwide particularly hitting hard at the United States with almost parallel to the European current unemployment rate; states the truth of Malaysia’s strong economy as compared to the west.

Certainly, many would have said that the west is a larger state than Malaysia. However, the truth is Malaysia has the strongest economy strength than the west which attracted George Soros to invest in Malaysia. Still, the Malaysian government never forget the incident of speculating the KL stock exchange in 1998 that almost led Malaysia into declaring bankruptcy.

A lot of us do not understand how important it is to sustain a strong economy during the recession period – here we could share a little information of what we believe is the best government so far in Asia. The Malaysia government has formulated the best strategy to curb unemployment rate from rising higher despite the hit of recession where massive jobs were created and low cost housing is on the pipeline to improve the local lifestyle. In this reference, we say Malaysia Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak has done well to save Malaysia from falling into the hands of the foreign power.

Today in Japan, it recorded a higher unemployment rate of 4.3% than analyzed which is still controllable as compared to the West.

Here in this chart below would indicated evidently that the WEST is infected with higher unemployment rate so far so true that THE WEST is interested to learn from the Malaysian government by introducing IMF – International Monetary Fund. The trick is IMF may not be the best solution for Malaysian government given the exemplary set by neighboring ASEAN countries where it contributes higher inflation to the affected country.

Most economists now believe that low; stable and most importantly predictable inflation is good for an economy. If inflation is low and predictable; it is easier to capture it in price adjustment contracts and interest rates reducing its distortionary impact. Moreover; knowing that prices will be slightly higher in the future gives the consumer an incentive to make purchases sooner, which boosts economy activity. Many central bankers have made their primary policy objective maintaining low and stable inflation; a policy called “Inflation targeting”.

What creates inflation?

Long-lasting episodes of high inflation are often the result of lax monetary policy. If the money supply grows too big relative to the size of an economy; the unit value of the currency diminishes; in other words; its purchasing power falls and prices rise.

When banks lower interest rates or a government raises spending; it can temporarily boost overall demand and economic growth. In such cases, it may be unwise to have adopted International Monetary Policy where IMF have recruited 45 governments that discussed framework for post-World War II international economic cooperation back in those early days. Those participating countries were concerned with the rebuilding of Europe and the global economic system after the war suggested on the role of IMF as a global economic institution.

In reality, it was imagined by the British economist that the IMF would be a cooperative fund upon which member states could draw to maintaining economic activity and employment through periodic crises with his view suggested an IMF that helped governments also act as the US government in response to World War II.

The truth? Viewing the statistic of the unemployment rate on Malaysia; does it need IMF?

During the Great Depression, countries sharply raised barriers to foreign trade in an attempt to improve their failing economies which led to the devaluation of national currencies and a decline in world trade.

The rationale – Is Malaysian’s current national currencies has been devalued? Is Malaysia suffering from failing economies? Under IMF – which countries are suffering from higher unemployment rate and its national currencies become weaker?

Time for IMF to reform its policy by not recruiting more member states with its failing policies.

The Malaysian government under Najib Tun Razak found the right balance boosting growth without overstimulating its economy and causing inflation.

However, will the Malaysians wiser enough to know of this?

Ten reasons for opposing IMF – What is the IMF?

The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank were created in 1944 at a conference in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, and are now based in Washington, DC. The IMF was originally designed to promote international economic cooperation and provide its member countries with short term loans so they could trade with other countries (achieve balance of payments). Since the debt crisis of the 1980′s, the IMF has assumed the role of bailing out countries during financial crises (caused in large part by currency speculation in the global casino economy) with emergency loan packages tied to certain conditions, often referred to as structural adjustment policies (SAPs). The IMF now acts like a global loan shark, exerting enormous leverage over the economies of more than 60 countries. These countries have to follow the IMF’s policies to get loans, international assistance, and even debt relief. Thus, the IMF decides how much debtor countries can spend on education, health care, and environmental protection. The IMF is one of the most powerful institutions on Earth — yet few know how it works.

1. The IMF has created an immoral system of modern day colonialism that SAPs the poor  — along with the WTO and the World Bank — has put the global economy on a path of greater inequality and environmental destruction. The IMF’s and World Bank’s structural adjustment policies (SAPs) ensure debt repayment by requiring countries to cut spending on education and health; eliminate basic food and transportation subsidies; devalue national currencies to make exports cheaper; privatize national assets; and freeze wages. Such belt-tightening measures increase poverty, reduce countries’ ability to develop strong domestic economies and allow multinational corporations to exploit workers and the environment A recent IMF loan package for Argentina, for example, is tied to cuts in doctors’ and teachers’ salaries and decreases in social security payments.. The IMF has made elites from the Global South more accountable to First World elites than their own people, thus undermining the democratic process.

2. The IMF serves wealthy countries and Wall Street – Unlike a democratic system in which each member country would have an equal vote, rich countries dominate decision-making in the IMF because voting power is determined by the amount of money that each country pays into the IMF’s quota system. It’s a system of one dollar, one vote. The U.S. is the largest shareholder with a quota of 18 percent. Germany, Japan, France, Great Britain, and the US combined control about 38 percent. The disproportionate amount of power held by wealthy countries means that the interests of bankers, investors and corporations from industrialized countries are put above the needs of the world’s poor majority.

3. The IMF is imposing a fundamentally flawed development model – Unlike the path historically followed by the industrialized countries, the IMF forces countries from the Global South to prioritize export production over the development of diversified domestic economies. Nearly 80 percent of all malnourished children in the developing world live in countries where farmers have been forced to shift from food production for local consumption to the production of export crops destined for wealthy countries. The IMF also requires countries to eliminate assistance to domestic industries while providing benefits for multinational corporations — such as forcibly lowering labor costs. Small businesses and farmers can’t compete. Sweatshop workers in free trade zones set up by the IMF and World Bank earn starvation wages, live in deplorable conditions, and are unable to provide for their families. The cycle of poverty is perpetuated, not eliminated, as governments’ debt to the IMF grows.

4. The IMF is a secretive institution with no accountability – The IMF is funded with taxpayer money, yet it operates behind a veil of secrecy. Members of affected communities do not participate in designing loan packages. The IMF works with a select group of central bankers and finance ministers to make polices without input from other government agencies such as health, education and environment departments. The institution has resisted calls for public scrutiny and independent evaluation.

5. IMF policies promote corporate welfare – To increase exports, countries are encouraged to give tax breaks and subsidies to export industries. Public assets such as forestland and government utilities (phone, water and electricity companies) are sold off to foreign investors at rock bottom prices. In Guyana, an Asian owned timber company called Barama received a logging concession that was 1.5 times the total amount of land all the indigenous communities were granted. Barama also received a five-year tax holiday. The IMF forced Haiti to open its market to imported, highly subsidized US rice at the same time it prohibited Haiti from subsidizing its own farmers. A US corporation called Early Rice now sells nearly 50 percent of the rice consumed in Haiti.

6. The IMF hurts workers – The IMF and World Bank frequently advise countries to attract foreign investors by weakening their labor laws — eliminating collective bargaining laws and suppressing wages, for example. The IMF’s mantra of “labor flexibility” permits corporations to fire at whim and move where wages are cheapest. According to the 1995 UN Trade and Development Report, employers are using this extra “flexibility” in labor laws to shed workers rather than create jobs. In Haiti, the government was told to eliminate a statute in their labor code that mandated increases in the minimum wage when inflation exceeded 10 percent. By the end of 1997, Haiti’s minimum wage was only $2.40 a day. Workers in the U.S. are also hurt by IMF policies because they have to compete with cheap, exploited labor. The IMF’s mismanagement of the Asian financial crisis plunged South Korea, Indonesia, Thailand and other countries into deep depression that created 200 million “newly poor.” The IMF advised countries to “export their way out of the crisis.” Consequently, more than US 12,000 steelworkers were laid off when Asian steel was dumped in the US.

7. The IMF’s policies hurt women the most – SAPs make it much more difficult for women to meet their families’ basic needs. When education costs rise due to IMF-imposed fees for the use of public services (so-called “user fees”) girls are the first to be withdrawn from schools. User fees at public clinics and hospitals make healthcare unaffordable to those who need it most. The shift to export agriculture also makes it harder for women to feed their families. Women have become more exploited as government workplace regulations are rolled back and sweatshops abuses increase.

8. IMF Policies hurt the environment – IMF loans and bailout packages are paving the way for natural resource exploitation on a staggering scale. The IMF does not consider the environmental impacts of lending policies, and environmental ministries and groups are not included in policy making. The focus on export growth to earn hard currency to pay back loans has led to an unsustainable liquidation of natural resources. For example, the Ivory Coast’s increased reliance on cocoa exports has led to a loss of two-thirds of the country’s forests.

9. The IMF bails out rich bankers, creating a moral hazard and greater instability in the global economy – The IMF routinely pushes countries to deregulate financial systems. The removal of regulations that might limit speculation has greatly increased capital investment in developing country financial markets. More than $1.5 trillion crosses borders every day. Most of this capital is invested short-term, putting countries at the whim of financial speculators. The Mexican 1995 peso crisis was partly a result of these IMF policies. When the bubble popped, the IMF and US government stepped in to prop up interest and exchange rates, using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street bankers. Such bailouts encourage investors to continue making risky, speculative bets, thereby increasing the instability of national economies. During the bailout of Asian countries, the IMF required governments to assume the bad debts of private banks, thus making the public pay the costs and draining yet more resources away from social programs.

10. IMF bailouts deepen, rather then solve, economic crisis – During financial crises — such as with Mexico in 1995 and South Korea, Indonesia, Thailand, Brazil, and Russia in 1997 — the IMF stepped in as the lender of last resort. Yet the IMF bailouts in the Asian financial crisis did not stop the financial panic — rather, the crisis deepened and spread to more countries. The policies imposed as conditions of these loans were bad medicine, causing layoffs in the short run and undermining development in the long run. In South Korea, the IMF sparked a recession by raising interest rates, which led to more bankruptcies and unemployment. Under the IMF imposed economic reforms after the peso bailout in 1995, the number of Mexicans living in extreme poverty increased more than 50 percent and the national average minimum wage fell 20 percent.

This article below reveals the immoral behaviorism by Anwar Ibrahim posted by this superblog AIDC that contains the real story behind Anwars’ disgusting sodomizing cases by Yuktes Vijay who were one of Anwar’s lawyers at that time.

Yuktes Vijay : The real story behind Sodomy 2 – Part 2

This article is in response to the claims of Dato Omar Abu Bakar in a video that was shared by Anwar Ibrahim on Facebook.

Why Anwar was in the apartment?

Anwar at various times claimed that he was in the apartment to meet some economists. However, none of these claims was ever substantiated. Not even one of the economist were brought to court to verify their presence with Anwar in court.

The truth is the defense council did interview 2 of the economists but they declined to take stand to support Anwar. Why? Were they really present there? Ask Anwar. This was indeed baffling as their evidence would have given Anwar a chance to prove to the general public that it was INDEED A BN CONSPIRACY.

Anwar claims he was set up but the question is what was he doing in the apartment? Typical Anwar. He puts the blame on one and all but fails to provide the sufficient and relevant evidence to come clean when he has the chance to do so.

Remember China Doll-Omega saga? If only he had shown his Omega watch or denied having one, he would not have the need to flash his tummy in every speeches or press conferences to prove his innocence. Well, the truth is at that point of time, he did have a tummy which was carefully concealed by a bullet vest which made him look not having a tummy. How I know this? I should thank Anwar for the wonderful tea he served in his house on March 21 2011. What happened on this day? Google it up!

The landlord of the apartment

The landlord, his wife and 2 maids were brought as defence witness’ for interview in KL High Court. Even he declined to be a witness. Imagine this. I have a friend. He gives me his house to have interviews, talks and even negotiations with people but hesitates to take the stand for you. I overheard a lot of disturbing things during this course of interview. For the record, the interview with the landlord was the longest and yet he did not take the stand.

What was spoken here and discussed here? I am privy to the information but I am declining to reveal much for now as I fear for my safety. Not wanting to sound dramatic but I do know the amount of harassing calls I am getting every single day.

All information that I know with regards to the issues that I have highlighted here will be out in my final part. Part 3. I promise to release it on nomination day. Part 3 will include the real story of why the house owner hesitated, alibi list, Anwar’s flip-flop game with the defense counsels, and PM Najib’s name was brought in to smear his credibility.

Cukuplah Anwar. Stop lying. Please —> “It’s enough Anwar, please stop lying”

Yuktes Vijay

What we hope is to see a strong government for Malaysia sustaining our economy without the interference of foreign power! That leaves us only with Najib Tun Razak to carry on building Malaysia higher and stronger without playing our backside. 

Especially with BABI of his immorality and obscenity, obscuring the interference of foreign power to the knowledge of Malaysian people; can the Malaysians really trust such immoral figure who so ambitiously wanted to be the next Prime Minister who also may be facing his judgment day behind bars sooner? The choice is yours; Malaysians whether you see through it or you see just half of it. Stay tuned!!!

By Jason Ng – Wall Street Journal

Airlines are hoping to cash in on the huge interest in Malaysia’s upcoming May 5 elections by offering discounts and promotions to entice Malaysians living abroad to come home to vote.

Reuters reported AirAsia hopes Malaysians living abroad will seize its special promotions to return home to vote on May 5.

“Fly Home to Vote” kicked it off, with cheap tickets offered by discount carrier AirAsia Bhd.

“We foresee many Malaysians will be making travel plans to return to [home], and we hope that our low fares will help provide convenience for people to fly back for the elections,” Aireen Omar, chief executive of AirAsia, said in a statement.

Malindo Air and national flag carrier Malaysian Airline System Bhd followed with their own enticements.

There are over one million Malaysians living and working outside Malaysia, according to MyOverseasVote, a group set up to campaign for the right of Malaysians abroad to vote. Roughly 40% work in Singapore and 20% in other Asian countries, the group said.

Electoral watchdog group Bersih says it is important for overseas Malaysians to cast their ballots given persistent charges of voter fraud and the public’s lack of confidence in the electoral system.

“We’re urging people to come back to vote and be sure that their votes will go to their preferred party because we’re gravely concerned about the possibility of fraud,” Bersih co-chairman Ambiga Sreenevasan told The Wall Street Journal.

National flag carrier Malaysian Airlines System Bhd isn’t offering any special fares, but it will allow Malaysians to change their flight schedules to around the election period free of charge, a company spokesperson said. Some travel will be domestic, as people work in one place but vote in another. The company’s low-cost offshoot, Firefly, is offering one-way fares of MYR66 for all domestic destinations.

Malindo Air, which received approval to begin commercial operations in February, said it will extend its special fares for travel around the peninsula and the two states in the Malaysian Borneo island.

Malaysiaairlinesfamilies comment “However, passengers should bear in mind that the recent plane crashed was a budget airline “LION AIR”; had injured many although there were no death”.

For those Malaysians living abroad to flying home on the election day should be wise in choosing a safe airlines other than a budget airlines with older air planes that may be delayed due to air plane technicalities particularly Air Asia – Cheap fares plausible delays and non-refunded tickets LOW CASTE BUDGET AIRLINES.

Malaysians living abroad should learn staying safe when flying with responsible airliners other than Air Asia – CHEAP airfares that comes with lots of air plane technicalities is getting everybody nowhere.

Air Asia has new concept – NOW Everyone is going NOWHERE.

Stay tuned for more information from Malaysiaairlinesfamilies and AirAsiafamilies

This week we would unveil the rooted foundation of the failing management in Malaysia Airlines.

We would begin unveiling the wicked structural planning by Ahmad Jauhari; episode-by-episode containing the factors corrupting Malaysia Airlines for Tony Fernandez.

This first episode distress one of the leads we believe is Hayati Dato Ali.

A double degree holder graduated with BSc in Finance and a BA in Economics from California State University before proceeding with an MBA from the same university. She started her career in Malaysia Airlines as Market Planning Analyst in Corporate Planning Division in 1986 after a brief stint at a local bank.

Her father; a Captain that crashed the hijacked plane in Tanjung Kupang, Johor, Malaysia on December 4^th; 1977.

Do we remember Danny Rashdan? The former MAS deputy CEO who was asked to resign after he illegally upgraded his nanny to MAS first class cabin; has a cousin-sister i.e. Hayati Dato’ Ali; still working for Malaysia Airlines.

Miss Hayati Dato Ali has been a circulated object serving as Executive Vice President for MAS In-flight Service since September 2006 and was removed from In-flight Service to Airport Operation in 2011 where she previously had served before as Assistant General Manager of Airport Operation for MAS.

Our reliable sources affirmed after Danny Rashdan tendered his resignation; Hayati Dato Ali pursued her appeal to Ahmad Jauhari to get transferred back to MAS In-flight Service where she could carry on what’s left designed by Danny Rashdan; which is to reduce manpower in Cabin Crew by means of forcing the senior staff to voluntarily resign under extreme pressure.

During her short stint with MAS Airport Operation; she had introduced ‘OUTSOURCING’ as way out supposedly for cost efficiency but ended with double costing for Malaysia Airlines. She had caused MAS Airport Operation incurred higher cost with inconsistency services where massive delays in delivery were the end of her career with MAS Airport Operation.

Knowing Hayati Dato Ali has defective leadership skills; Ahmad Jauhari the clueless MAS CEO went ahead approving her running MAS In-flight Service division only with “this time” she is mission-ed to depress and contaminate the entire MAS division.

MAS in-flight services have been the main attraction for frequent travelers of Malaysia Airlines. By contaminating the main services; it would destroy the entire company where-thence a prescribed alternative will be to OUTSOURCE the entire In-flight division gradually which is already in process with one of the vendors designing MAS Cabin Crew’s roster is India-based company owned by Tony Fernandez.

Miss Hayati Dato Ali is famously known for her intoxicating conversation – an orthodox idiotic streak. She has the quality of being down straight idiotic, very intellectually challenged chosen as the representative of the middle management for Malaysia Airlines by Ahmad Jauhari – The Greatest Con-artist.

Her recent decision for reviewing all contracts with MAS long-term suppliers has cause an internal upheaval boycotting in beverages supply for both MAS First and Business Classes. It looks like this could be the latest inclination from Miss Hayati Dato Ali that is to sabotaging MAS loyalty program via the shortchange for the In-flight service that MAS is well renowned for.

Either Miss Hayati is planning to sabotage Malaysia Airlines or she is down straight intellectually challenged.

Our readers have informed Malaysiaairlinesfamilies that MAS loyal travelers were amazed when being served with those beverages ordered for Economy class. We are informed there were no supply of higher grade wines for first and business class travelers routing to Australia and Europe. If this is true; we ask for MAS TOP MANAGEMENT to end this immediately before all loyal travelers cease their memberships with Enrich Loyalty Program.

Hmm..is this what Malaysia Airlines made of with such a quality management for an Executive Vice President? Or could this be one of the destructive plans driving away MAS loyal travelers?

The Oneworld strategic planning for its alliance is QUALITY TRAVELING EXPERIENCE and there you go Malaysia Airlines with the dumbness running to reducing the quality in-flight service for it; we doubt the alliance with Oneworld would be of LONG-TERM planned.

From our gathering sources, Hayati Dato Ali has two daughters whom she intends to recruit into Malaysia Airlines to carry on her legacy contaminating the entire division.

We hope Malaysia Airlines will be stringent in screening cronyism and nepotism from being carried on to the next MAS generation.

We appeal to our readers to come forward with more internal true stories exposing the intellectually challenging middle management of Malaysia Airlines.

On our next episode we would expose Miss Hayati Dato Ali’s cronies from the opposition party and their failure in coordinating MAS In-flight Service division. Get ready to unveil more of Hayati’s impaired coordination / sabotage inside Malaysia Airlines.

Stay tuned to Malaysiaairlinesfamilies for best insight true stories!

This few weeks are the Election Fever and we are reproducing an analysis by People Against Opposition.

Looking at numbers on  paper, there are deductions we could infer on the actual scenario of our present political standings. We are all being programmed. With aggressive hate campaigns by Pakatan Rakyat, people in Semenanjung have been inflicted by a sickness called BNAHS.

What is BNAHS ? It is an abbreviation for Barisan Nasional Acquired Hatred Syndrom.

Why “Acquired”? Because we were not born to hate BN. Why do we hate BN? We hate BN because we were taught or programmed to hate BN. Who programmed us and how are they programming us ?

Pakatan Rakyat created and enhanced their HATE Speeches during the 2008 12th General Election Campaign. These are extremely sophisticated persuasion techniques used by PR to brainwash the people. Pakatan Rakyat are masters in the art of persuasion. Let us look at what is this art of persuasion ?

Persuasiveness is one of the most important skills anyone can learn because it is useful in countless situations. At work, at home, and in your social life, the ability to be persuasive and influence others can be instrumental for achieving goals and being happy. Learning about the tricks of persuasion can also give you insight into when they’re being used on you.

Here are 9 of the best tricks to be persuasive and influence others:

Framing
Framing is a technique often used in politics. A popular example of framing is inheritance taxes. Politicians who are opposed to inheritance taxes will call them death taxes. By using the word death instead of inheritance, all kinds of negative connotations come to mind.

Framing is quite subtle, but by using emotionally charged words, like death, you can easily persuade people to your point of view.

Mirroring
Mirroring someone is when you mimic their movements. The movement can be virtually anything, but some obvious ones are hand gestures, leaning forward or away, or various head and arm movements. We all do this unconsciously, and if you pay attention you’ll probably notice yourself doing it, I know I have.

How to mirror someone is self explanatory, but a few key things to remember are to be subtle about it and leave a delay between the other person’s movement and your mirroring, 2-4 seconds works best.

Scarcity
This is one that advertisers use a lot. Opportunities, whatever they are, seem a lot more appealing when there is a limited availability.

This can be useful to the average person in the right situation, but even more importantly, this is a method of persuasion to be aware of. Stop and consider how much you’re being influenced by the fact that a product is scarce. If the product is scarce, there must be a ton of demand for it right? In the case of Pakatan Rakyat, they throw out ideas that justice is scarce in Malaysia and on the other side, corruption is abundant.

Reciprocation
It’s the old saying, “Do unto others…”. When someone does something for us, we feel compelled to return the favor. So, if you want someone to do something nice for you, why not do something nice for them first. In a business setting, maybe you pass them a lead. If at home, maybe it’s you letting the neighbor borrow the lawn mower. It doesn’t matter where or when you do it, the key is to compliment the relationship.

Timing
People are more likely to be agreeable and submissive when they’re mentally fatigued. Before you ask someone for something they might not be quick to agree to, try waiting until a more opportune time when they’ve just done something mentally taxing. This could be at the end of the work day when you catch a co-worker on their way out the door. Whatever you ask, a likely response is, “I’ll take care of it tomorrow.”

Congruence
We all try, subconsciously, to be consistent with previous actions. One great example is a technique used by salespeople. A salesperson will shake your hand as he is negotiating with you. In most peoples minds, a handshake equates to a closed deal, and so by doing this before the deal is reached, the salesperson is much more likely to negotiate you in to a closed deal.

A good way to use this yourself is to get people acting before they make up their minds. If, for example, you were out and about with a friend and you wanted to go see a movie but the friend was undecided, you could start walking in the direction of the theater while they make up their mind.

Fluid Speech
When we talk, we often use little interjections and hesitant phrases such as “ummm” or “I mean” and of course there is the ubiquitous “like”. These little conversation quirks have the unintended effect of making us seem less confident and sure of ourselves, and thus less persuasive.

If you’re confident in your speech, others will be more easily persuaded by what you have to say.

Herd Behavior
We are all natural born followers. It’s sad but true. We constantly look to those around us to determine our actions; we have the need for acceptance.

A simple, effective way to use this to your advantage is to be a leader, let the herd follow you. Anwar Ibrahim does this very well.

Friends and Authorities
We are far more likely to follow or be persuaded by someone we like or by someone who is in an authority position. Not only is this a good one to be aware of to combat persuasive techniques being used on you, it’s also a good one to use on others because you would be surprised how easy it is to get people to like you and establish authority within groups. Again an Anwar Ibrahim specialty.

Analysis on Pakatan Rakyat Component Parties

Each and every component party in PR has a little role to play and they effectively manage to assume their roles focusing on the small area they are tasked with but the nett result is overwhelmingly potent. Let us analyse these roles of PR component parties and put them in place.

PKR
Anwar has this big ambition to be Prime Minister. PM candidate actually, should be selected among the best of the strongest party. Selected. Dipilih. But this guy  without even having a slightest degree of shame assume that others should select him as Prime Minister. He was ousted by UMNO which found out that he was not fit to be the next Prime Minister due to sexual desire sickness he is suffering. He fooled everybody in UMNO.

At last, Tun M turn the table against Anwar out of principle when facts were brought forward to Tun about Anwar Ibrahim’s illicit sexual activities. Most horrible. Normally , if it is a conspiracy and the faulted guy is sincere, he will withdraw leaving God to decide on his behalf if  he is a true believer. Then normally what will happen is that, the people will come out on their own and protest.

If that is the case, Anwar will be much more believable. If he did that, i think by now he would be the Prime Minister due to the revolt by the people. No, Anwar took to the street and paid his already ready and trained supporters among Malaysians to chant Reformasi.

That means, these zombies that were created by Anwar Ibrahim were already within UMNO, within BN itself. When Anwar was thrown out, out of the ashes of disgrace , his army of zombies came out from a black-hole. What an army of politically wrong and perverted people Anwar’s supporters are !

Anwar has few agendas of his own. If we care to study his YOU TUBE speeches, we will see , that he is not talking about how he is going to turn around Malaysia to be a better country. He has no ideas at all how to turn around Malaysia actually. What he effectively did was to repeat and repeat in the most vocal and vehement way possible, to create doubts in the mind of Malaysians about the status of the BN government. His points of attack are namely ;

1. Judiciary

Anwar must make our judiciary look bad at any cost because, this is the judiciary that convicted him for abuse of power. He will go all out to prove that our judiciary system is running kangaroo courts. He uses Tun Salleh Abbas dismissal effectively whereas the Tun Salleh Abbas fiasco is more of a personal feud the former Lord Justice had with the then Yang Di-PerTuan Agong which causes the then PM , Tun M to step in to remedy the situation. He got hold of the VK Lingam tape but my understanding is , that tape has no  credibility because no one knows who VK Lingam was talking to on the other end of the phone line. No one can proof that the person on the other end of the phone is Lord Justice Tun Fairuz. Anwar recycled all these information and sent it back to the common people who doesn’t know how court proceedings worked and bash them with these half truth…

In the matter relating Altantuya, again the judiciary was attacked vehemently despite Razak Baginda giving evidence of the purchase of some military equipments occurred before Razak Baginda meet Altantuya. Fake photos were released and fake SD’s were made by paying an Indian, an ex-royalty blogger and one high rank army personnel. Anwar Ibrahim did all that. He is a master tactician. An evil one actually. Anwar Ibrahim by hook or by crook must show to all Malaysians that our judiciary is out of control indeed. Controlled by the Cabinet and the judiciary doesn’t have its own independent thinking. This is purposely done so that, whatever historical conviction made by the Malaysian Courts upon Anwar himself will be considered null and void. Now , Anwar’s desire to become the Prime Minister is intensified so that once he becomes Prime Minister, he will re-open back all his file cases to be retried and show to the whole world that he is actually mistreated. The first 100 days of Anwar Ibrahim as a Prime Minister of Malaysia will be mired with hijacking of the judiciary system by Anwar personally. He has every intend to do that because that is the only thing that will salvage his image as a religious personality in the eyes of the people. Anwar Ibrahim then will be Malaysian first “Dictator” like Hitler who will chopped down anyone who opposed him.

2, MACC (Anti-Corruption Agency)

Anwar Ibrahim second line of attack is , MACC. MACC is the only body that could neutralise Anwar Ibrahim charged that the BN government is corrupted to the core. We all know that  we cannot have a perfect government. Government are actually made of people selected by the people. We all have our weaknesses and weak moments. The Kelantan Government sets up a Menteri Besar incorporated business entity headed by Tuan Guru Nik Aziz’s son in law. Is that not corruption ? Abuse of power ? Nevertheless, Nik Aziz is just like any one of us…”Dia pun ada hati jugak nak bagi anak beranak dia senang”….None of us spoke against this. But if it is Rafidah Aziz’s son in law, we screamed our loudest voice , AP , AP..and eventually Rafidah Aziz was removed from the Cabinet. Nik Aziz should not put his son-in-law there in the first place because that is exactly what the Opposition is complaining about BN. These are human tendencies. In BN, actually Anwar was removed because of corruption, abused of power against UMI Hafilda. Untill today, Anwar dare not file defamation suit against UMI Hafilda. Anwar dare not file defamation suit against Zulkifli Zainordin or Ezam or Datuk Zahrain. These people were very closed to him and all of them charged The Boss of corrupt practices and illicit sexual conducts. Anwar uses Teoh Beng Hock’s case which was a unique case to blame MACC officers of murdering Teoh because they have got no motive to do so. My theory is, Anwar is capable of paying someone to push Teoh Beng Hock off the 7th floor caused Teoh has evidence of Selangor State government dark practices involving millions of ringgit. The Selangor State government has a motive in the death of Teoh Beng Hock, not MACC.

3. Rasuah (Corruption)

Anything and everything with BN and the government is relative to Rasuah. This is Anwar Ibrahim’s no 1 charge against the ruling government. Everbody seems to be corrupted. The situation is very simple. If you have credible evidence about any corrupt practices, just make a police report and MACC will take care of it. If Anwar was in Singapore, I think Lee Kuan Yew will sue him for defamation till he bankcrupt.

On the sideline Anwar Ibrahim attacked 1Malaysia and ETP and labelled it as government propaganda to cheat the people. These are excellent initiatives that the government has responded to due to the opposition persistence that Malaysia is breaking apart and the economy is in a bad state  but so sorry for this ass banger, he just cant see the good side of anything at all. Anwar Ibrahim has no principle. He even opposes initiatives that are beneficial for the (rakyat) people.

PKR roles in PR are to attack Malaysian judiciary, MACC and charged the government of corrupt practices no matter how many convictions the government made of its own civil servants and ministers, BN is still corrupted. The Suruhanjaya Pilihanraya was also previously under attack but due to the 2008 Election Results, they cant attack Suruhanjaya Pilihanraya that much and also due to some by election results that favoured them. There was  insinuation that the Sarawak State Election was rigged  but no evidence whatsoever brought forward.

It is difficult to cheat (“tipu”) in  the Malaysian elections because votes are counted in front of competing parties representatives. Malaysians are geniuses at creating theories especially if it is against the government. Then PKR also played the role of blaming the government on hiking petrol price and the prices of consumer goods. No one bother to explain about basic economy of demand and supply. BN had brought the Malaysian Economy in and out of inflation, deflation, recession, boom and bust , altogether not once, but several times during its tenure as the sole custodian of Malaysian economy.

PKR serves as a bridge to bring PAS and DAP together. Anwar cheated  PAS Malays that DAP is good and he will go to DAP and cheated  Chinese over the other side that PAS is good. The recent conclusion of Sarawak State election showed that there is no such thing as Pakatan Rakyat. They were all fighting each other there.

Now we look at;

PAS
This party behaves as though they were chosen by Allah. They equate PAS to Islam. Actually , from administration point of view, PAS is one of the lousiest state administrator. Nevertheless they have created loyal supporters who are willing to starve with their government. PAS created enough zombies to support them even though these zombies knew that the state government is incapable of developing the state .

PAS’s role in PR is, tell the Malays that UMNO is a traitor and UMNO Malays are not Muslim. PR uses PAS to convert the Malays into becoming PAS supporters or symphatizers. PAS is supposed to demonise UMNO and UMNO must forever hate PAS. If PAS and UMNO unites, then , all hell will break loose for Pakatan Rakyat. This new coalition party between PAS and UMNO will be the strongest Malay party in Malaysia.

DAP
DAP has one simple role. Tell the Chinese to hate BN. The Malays of UMNO is no good. The Chinese need to be given more as they are not given enough. DAP is to influence MCA and Gerakan that UMNO is not giving enough to the Chinese. By supporting DAP, actually the Chinese got nothing out of it. The Chinese are the biggest looser in Malaysia if they support DAP.

Overall, here are an analysis of Malaysian current political scenarios. We look at the standings of all the political parties in Malaysia based upon 2008 General Election on the parliamentary seats.

The percentage for the Parliament seats between BN and PR is = BN 63% and PR 37%

2008 can be considered as a bad year for Barisan Nasional. Even in a bad year , UMNO still held 36% of  parliament seats. To start with 63% since 2008, is  actually a very strong number for BN. The changes done by UMNO for the last 3 years were tremendous. UMNO went through a re branding process. With the recent support from Sarawak shows that  PR could not make a dent in Sarawak. Sabah and Sarawak will deliver the 17% or more for BN. 36 + 17 =  53% UMNO , Gerakan, MCA and MIC need to work for only 24%  more to get above 70% for the 2/3 majority.

PR on the other hand will have to start with 37%. There is no way, PKR can double its Malay based support. Anwar Ibrahim has more than one  sexual allegations against him. Sarawak Election showed that , PKR is loosing ground. DAP cant deliver more than 12%. That is their max. PKR will loose 10% of its support from the Malays. Some Malays in PKR  will swing back to UMNO. Looking at the popularity of BN in Sarawak, the Semenanjung Chinese will open up their eyes about the real strength of PKR. They will have to support BN or else another five years of no progress with DAP. Gerakan / MCA and MIC must repositioned them-selves to get that 14% votes for their respective parties. They need 4.5% votes each. That is not impossible.

PAS will somehow maintain their 11%. Currently there are efforts being made to rob Kelantan and Kedah away from PAS. If UMNO can get 5% of what PAS has, that will be good enough.

Overall, Barisan Nasional Will Definitely Win the 13th General Election ! Hurray!

Mike Billington from Executive Intelligence Review in his article “British Empire Tool To Recolonize Malaysia” wrote as that When Soros led the speculative assault on Malaysia and its neighbors in 1997, Anwar, who served as Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister to Dr. Mahathir at the time, had demanded that the speculators be given free rein, and imposed “IMF conditions without the IMF,” Mr. Billington further stated that Anwar defended the speculators, admitting that he had circulated Soros’s papers to policymakers in Malaysia, and defended Soros when Mahathir called Soros a thief and a moron. In response to a public question from Mr.Billinton in 2005, Anwar defended his effort to impose IMF austerity and free-trade dictates on Malaysia, despite the fact that such policies subsequently destroyed the economies of Malaysia’s neighbors.

Above are some of the excerpt from Mr.Billington’s article and ought to be read in its entirety (click here).

The first definite indication that the Illuminati has launched a major offensive towards South East Asia was in 1997 when they engineered the regional currency crisis with Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia as the major target. The offensive was mostly a success with the exception of Malaysia. Lots of people died and the Illuminati successfully overpowered the Thailand and Indonesian’s governance.

There was a similarity in the offensive carried out against Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand. First of all, of all the 9 nations directly affected by the crisis, only these three were politically aggravated by the crisis. Other nations especially those which are known as allies of the United States (such as Singapore, South Korea, Japan and Philippine) were spared from suffering the same fate. Secondly, the political event consequent to the crisis happened during this period was later found out to be the key event behind the rise of certain politicians link to crisis itself. For example, consequent to the reformist demand, In 1997 Thailand adopted a new constitution which aimed to reduce the number of parties in Thailand. It was later agreed that as a result of these new constitution, the majority of smaller parties in Thailand banded together under Thaksin Shinawatra’s Thai Rak Thai party (a new party formed merely a year after the crisis) to capture a majority of the seats. Ironically, it was later disclosed that Thaksin Shinawatra was one of the man who had played a role in the 1997 crisis, It has been investigated by the court of justice and as leaked by Thaksin’s former cabinet member Sanoh that “There were four people who got involved in the Baht depreciation, i.e. Chavalit, Thaksin, Thanong and Pokin,”.

In Indonesia, it was agreed that the fatal shooting of four students of Trisakti University was a planned triggering mechanism of the Indonesian riot which had lasted for three days but resulted with the death of as many of 5,000 peoples comprising mostly the ethnic Chinese. A government minister reported the damage or destruction of 2,479 shop-houses, 1,026 ordinary houses, 1,604 shops, 383 private offices, 65 bank offices, 45 workshops, 40 shopping malls, 13 markets, and 12 hotels. It was reported that shooting was deliberately done by an unknown men on motorcycles who appeared on the flyover which overlooks Trisakti. The identity of these men was never known.

Many months later; a theory surfaced that the instigators to these riots were from the military itself. An independent investigation into the events managed to record a testimony from a taxi driver reported hearing a man in a military helicopter encouraging people on the ground to carry out looting; shop-owners at a Plaza claimed that, before the riots, military officers tried to extract protection money; a teenager claimed he and thousands of others had been trained as protesters; a street child alleged that Kopassus officers ordered him and his friends to become rioters; there was a report of soldiers being dressed up as students and then taking part in rioting; eyewitnesses spoke of muscular men with short haircuts arriving in military-style trucks and directing attacks on Chinese homes and businesses.

Many believed that the mastermind behind these riots is the Illuminist General Prabowo Subianto. Prabowo whom was lionized by his American counterparts as a future national leader; is believed to have used Kopassus and the army in general as the instrument to trigger the chaos. It was also later implicated that Prabowo is the man behind the formation of ‘ninja squads’, presumably the same squad behind the murder of numerous religious men in Banyuwangi and the one operated by the paramilitary groups in East Timor.

It is interesting to know that Prabowo has once utilized the tactic of marrying a President Suharto’s daughter in order to gain access to the presidential palace. The same tactic adopted by Khairy Jamaluddin of Malaysia who once announced his dream of becoming the next Prime Minister before his age of 40. Prabowo also has the same background profile with Anwar Ibrahim and Khairy Jamaluddin. All of them actually harvested billion dollars state’s money through corruption loopholes in the government.

Prabowo and his billionaire brother Hashim is also the man behind the formation of ‘Partai Gerakan Indonesia Raya’ or Gerindra in short. The purpose behind the formation of Gerindra is sort of the same with Anwar Ibrahim and his PKR in Malaysia, namely to promote Prabowo as the next President of Indonesia. After he failed in his attempt to be nominated as presidential candidate for Golkar Party, he exited Golkra and instead used Gerindra to nominate him as Presidential candidate for 2009 General Election. However due to his history which was perceived as a liability against his chances, he was advised by his advisor Alex Castinallos (a U.S. Republican Party political media consultant and also top media adviser to Bush Cheney ’04) to shift his strategy by agreeing to be nominated as vice president alongside Megawati Suekarboputri as Presidential candidate against Susilo-Boediono team. It is very interesting to note that Prabowo like Anwar Ibrahim seems unable to escape the influence of Illuminati even for minor detail such as choosing the logo of his party. Whereas Anwar Ibrahim had chosen the “all seeing eye” as the logo for Parti Keadilan Rakyat, Prabowo had chosen an emblem very similar to the Illuminati’s eagle emblem. Coincidence you say?

Today, General Probowo continues his mission to be next president of Indonesia in 2014 when Indonesia held its next Presidential Election. It seems that the Illuminati / Masonic mission to establish Novus Ordos Seclorum (New World Order) is the almost in synchronize in Indonesia and Malaysia. Furthermore, due to the recent more event which saw natural (or as I personally prefers it as ‘unnatural) disasters, political issues and spiraling economy due to current world recession (all directly or indirectly contributed by the Illuminati themselves), it is predicted that there is now an ongoing efforts to shift the blame on the president in order to destabilize the government so that the election to be brought forward in 2013. Whether this prediction will materialized is yet to be seen.

Prabowo, Thaksin, Anwar Ibrahim route to power (and later humiliation) shares quite a handful of similarities. For one thing, all of them are corrupt and corruptly uses their power to harvest their wealth. Prabowo is well known using his proximity to the presidential palace to enrich his brother Hashim Djojohadikusumo who is amongst the richest men in Indonesia.

Anwar Ibrahim on the other hand uses his former glory as Finance Minister to enrich his dad (Datuk Ibrahim A Rahman) as shareholders of IOI, Pengkalen Holdings, Nissan Industrial Oxygen Inc) and his brothers Farizan, Marzukhi, Rani and Rosli (Pengkalen and Penas Corp). Thaksin on another hand was already found guilty in a Thai court of corruption and currently a wanted criminal by his own country. The corruption charges against him are quite a handful, from purchase of four 772 million baht plots of land from in 2003 to issuing an unlawful cabinet resolution approving the spending of state funds to conspiring to evade taxes of 546 million baht (US$15.6 million) in a 1997 transfer of Shin Corp shares. Like Anwar and Probowo, Thaksin uses his wife, his children and his relatives as proxy to accumulate his wealth.

Other similarities between these three men are their history in politics. The most outstanding similarities were the fact that all these men seems to have a single political goal in life that is to become the number one person of their respective country. Like Anwar Ibrahim, Thaksin was actually a Deputy Prime Minister during the 1997 crisis and was involved in the decision to float the baht which led to its devaluation and the ignition of the crisis. During a censure debate on 27 September 1997, Democrat Suthep Thaugsuban even accused Thaksin of profiting from insider information about the government’s decision. In the aftermath of the crisis, Thaksin then founded the Thai Rak Thai party in 1998 which he uses as a vehicle to ride on people’s resentment towards the government in order to won a sweeping victory in the January 2001 elections. So you see, what Thaksin has done is quite similar to what Anwar Ibrahim is doing. Anwar as we know it, was personally responsible for attempting to adopt the IMF-style policy in Malaysia in 1997. Such Indonesian style disaster was only avoided when he was out maneuvered by Tun Mahathir who corrected the policy and sacked him from his post. He then started his reformasi movement and founded PKR as a vehicle to do exactly the same as what Thaksin had done. The only difference was that where Thaksin had succeeded, Anwar had not.

Thaksin, Prabowo and Anwar also shared the same tendency to run away when the future looks bleak. Thaksin as we know is now hopping from one foreign soil to another seeking asylum to escape prosecution. Prabowo shared the same strategy of hiding in Jordan in 1998 when his role in the riots was known by the public. I don’t think there’s any need to explain the same tendency adopted by Anwar Ibrahim. I believe everyone still remembers his hiding in the Turkish Embassy in 2008 and his others exploits of trying to run to other countries whenever he believes he is in trouble.

These are some of the examples on how stereotypes the Illuminati plan. Because all three men received instruction from the same source therefore for those who care to read in details on the stories behind the 1997 currency crisis will realize the rhythm of Illuminati’s in these entire event and the men benefiting from it.

The above article is a few examples on how Illuminati agent works. It is therefore advisable for all to be aware about any individuals rising to power which shares the same profile as these three and this article was produced in December 3, 2010.

If we take a minute to ponder; we would be able to recap the similarities used by BABI – Brother Anwar Bin Ibrahim seizing the opportunity to cease BN ruling coalition paving way for him to be crowned the next Prime Minister of Malaysia. All this is prepping to embrace the IMF policies. Even BABI tried rejecting IMF for that matter via his most recent speeches; it does not mean he won’t invite IMF if he becomes the Next Prime Minister of Malaysia.

Stay tuned to us for our next article.

Rockybru – a popular blogger has received the following email concerning the Malaysia General Election analyzing the behavior of a leader who’s going against his own words.

Via email:
“In the past, the Election of United States – though Gore came in second in the electoral vote, he received 543,895 more popular votes than Bush in 2000.

“This marked only the fourth election in U.S. history in which the eventual winner failed to win a plurality of the popular vote (after the elections of 1824,1876, and 1888)

“In the 2012 election, House Democrats won a plurality nation-wide with 1.4 million more votes but the Republicans were able to retain a 234-to-201 seat majority due to their advantage in the congressional redistricting process following the 2010 United States Census and because many Democratic votes were concentrated into urban and minority districts. In the previous century, on four occasions the party with a plurality of the popular vote was unable to receive a majority in the House, but only once since World War II. The last time was in 1996, where the GOP kept the House for similar reasons.”

The point the analyst wants to make is this: that the popular vote is not the deciding factor in a democratic election, not even in the US elections. And certainly popular votes don’t suggest fraud, rigging, black magic, etc. If they do, then the Americans would have Al Gore, who, incidentally, was a good buddy for Anwar Ibrahim, as its President instead of Bush.

In Malaysia, popular votes don’t decide who form the government at Federal level. They never did. It is the number of parliamentary seats you win. Simple as that. Malaysians have done that over and over against for 13 general elections and hundreds of by-elections. And if Anwar Ibrahim tells you that BN cheated because Pakatan got more of the popular votes, then he’s just found an excuse to stay on in politics instead of keeping his word about quitting if he does not become PM after PRU13.

Oh, by the way, Washington says it is looking forward to working with Najib, the democratically-elected Prime Minister of Malaysia, again:

U.S. Department of State

DIPLOMACY IN ACTION

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2013/05/208988.htm#

Congratulations to Barisan Nasional and Prime Minister Najib/ Electoral Process

Patrick Ventrell
Acting Deputy Spokesperson
Daily Press Briefing
Washington, DC
May 6, 2013

Daily Press Briefing – May 6, 2013
1:11 p.m. EDT

QUESTION:

Elections in Malaysia?

MR. VENTRELL:

Yeah.

QUESTION:

Do you recognize the victory of the ruling coalition of Prime Minister Najib, or do you support the claim by the opposition led by Anwar Ibrahim that the election were fraudulent?

MR. VENTRELL:

Thank you for the question, Nicolas. We congratulate the people of Malaysia on holding the most competitive election in their country’s history. We were pleased to see Malaysians across the political spectrum engaged in the electoral process in large numbers with unprecedented enthusiasm. We congratulate Barisan Nasional and Prime Minister Najib on their victory in Malaysia’s 13th general election. We look forward to working with the new government once it is formed.

We are aware of concerns about voting irregularities and note that the opposition parties faced significant restrictions on access to the media. Addressing these issues is important to strengthen confidence in the electoral process. And so we call on all parties to peacefully respect the will of the voters.

QUESTION:

But you don’t think there needs to be a recount.

MR. VENTRELL:

In this instance, we understand that the opposition has expressed some concern about irregularities and we have some concerns also about restriction on access to the media.

Stay tuned to us for more information. Cheers!

Failure of U.S. to subvert the Elections and Install a “Proxy Regime” reported by the Global Research

May 8, 2013 (LD) – Wall Street and London’s hegemonic ambitions in Asia, centered around installing proxy regimes across Southeast Asia and using the supranational ASEAN bloc to encircle and contain China, suffered a serious blow this week when Western-proxy and Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim’s party lost in Malaysia 13th General Elections.

Malaysia 13th General Election on May 5, 2013 results shown the present ruling coalition won with majority leading Barisan National as the Malaysian new Government for 2013-2018. Najib Razak sworn as Malaysia Prime Minister for second term.

Image : Despite the US mobilizing the summation of its media power and pouring millions of dollars into the opposition party, including the creation and perpetuation of fake-NGOs such as Bersih and the Merdeka Center, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak sailed to a comfortable victory in this year’s general elections. The cheap veneer has begun peeling away from America’s “democracy promotion” racket, leaving its proxies exposed and frantic, and America’s hegemonic ambitions across Asia in serious question.

While Anwar Ibrahim’s opposition party, Pakatan Rakyat (PR) or “People’s Alliance”, attempted to run on an anti-corruption platform, its campaign instead resembled verbatim attempts by the West to subvert governments politically around the world, including most recently in Venezuela and in Russia in 2012.

Just as in Russia where so-called “independent” election monitor GOLOS turned out to be fully funded by the US State Department through the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), Malaysia’s so-called election monitor, the Merdeka Center for Opinion Research, is likewise funded directly by the US through NED. Despite this, Western media outlets, in pursuit of promoting the Western-backed People’s Alliance, has repeatedly referred to Merdeka as “independent.”

The BBC in its article, “Malaysia election sees record turnout,” lays out the well-rehearsed cries of “stolen elections” used by the West to undermine the legitimacy of polls it fears its proxy candidates may lose – with  the US-funded Merdeka Center cited in attempts to bolster these claims. Their foreign funding and compromised objectivity is never mentioned (emphasis added) :

Allegations of election fraud surfaced before the election. Some of those who voted in advance told BBC News that indelible ink – supposed to last for days – easily washed off.

“The indelible ink can be washed off easily, with just water, in a few seconds,” one voter, Lo, told BBC News from Skudai.

Another voter wrote: “Marked with “indelible ink” and voted at 10:00. Have already cleaned off the ink by 12:00. If I was also registered under a different name and ID number at a neighbouring constituency, I would be able to vote again before 17:00!”

The opposition has also accused the government of funding flights for supporters to key states, which the government denies.

Independent pollster Merdeka Center has received unconfirmed reports of foreign nationals being given IDs and allowed to vote.

However, an election monitoring organization funded by a foreign government which openly seeks to remove the current ruling party from Malaysia in favor of long-time Wall Street servant Anwar Ibrahim is most certainly not “independent.”

The ties between Anwar Ibrahim’s “People’s Alliance” and the US State Department don’t end with the Merdeka Center, but continue into the opposition’s street movement, “Bersih.” Claiming to fight for “clean and fair” elections, Bersih in reality is a vehicle designed to mobilize street protests on behalf of Anwar’s opposition party. Bersih’s alleged leader, Ambiga Sreenevasan, has admitted herself that her organization has received cash directly from the United States via the National Endowment for Democracy’s National Democratic Institute (NDI), and convicted criminal George Soros’ Open Society.

The Malaysian Insider reported on June 27, 2011 that Bersih leader Ambiga Sreenevassan admitted to Bersih receiving some money from two US organisations — the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and Open Society Institute (OSI) — for other projects, which she stressed were unrelated to the July 9 march.

A visit to the NDI website revealed indeed that funding and training had been provided by the US organization – before NDI took down the information and replaced it with a more benign version purged entirely of any mention of Bersih. For funding Ambiga claims is innocuous, the NDI’s rushed obfuscation of any ties to her organization suggests something far more sinister at play.

Photo: NDI’s website before taking down any mention to Malaysia’s Bersih movement.

The mastermind behind NDI, the convicted criminal George Soros has planned for 30 years to invade Asia Pacific with his “DEMOCRACY” strategy. The move is to contain China in Asia Pacific using the homosexual leader Anwar Ibrahim – another ex-convict led his campaign in Malaysia under the DEMOCRACY pursuits following a closer monitoring on Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Afghanistan, China, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Burma, Cambodia, Hong Kong, Nepal and Pakistan. To change Malaysian longest ruling coalition is to bring in George Soros and his proxies – this is further escalated by the principle of Malaysian government over the imports from Israel. 

Wake up Malaysians – read and remember this attempted invasion by George Soros!

The substantial, yet carefully obfuscated support the West has lent Anwar should be of no surprise to those familiar with Anwar’shistory. That Anwar Ibrahim himself was Chairman of the Development Committee of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 1998, held lecturing positions at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, was a consultant to the World Bank, and a panelist at the Neo-Con lined National Endowment for Democracy’s “Democracy Award” and a panelist at a NED donation ceremony – the very same US organization funding and supporting Bersih and so-called “independent” election monitor Merdeka – paints a picture of an opposition running for office in Malaysia, not for the Malaysian people, but clearly for the corporate financier interests of Wall Street and London.

Photo: Taken from the US National Endowment for Democracy’s 2007 Democracy Award event held in Washington D.C., Anwar Ibrahim can be seen to the far left and participated as a “panelist.” It is no surprise that NED is now subsidizing his bid to worm his way back into power in Malaysia.

In reality, Bersih’s leadership along with Anwar and their host of foreign sponsors are attempting to galvanize the very real grievances of the Malaysian people and exploit them to propel themselves into power. While many may be tempted to suggest that “clean and fair elections” truly are Bersih and Anwar’s goal, and that US funding via NED’s NDI and convicted criminal, billionaire bankster George Soros’ Open Society are entirely innocuous, a thorough examination of these organizations, how they operate, and their admitted agenda reveals the proverbial cliff Anwar and Bersih are leading their followers and the nation of Malaysia over.

As Bersih predictably mobilizes in the streets on behalf of Anwar’s opposition party in the wake of their collective failure during Malaysia’s 2013 general elections, it is important for Malaysians to understand the true nature of the Western organizations funding their attempts to politically undermine the ruling party and divide Malaysians against each other, and exactly why this is being done in the greater context of US hegemony in Asia.

Anwar & Bersih’s US State Department Backers

The US State Department’s NED and NDI are most certainly not benevolent promoters of democracy and freedom. Does Boeing, Goldman Sachs, Exxon, the SOPA, ACTA, CISPA-sponsoring US Chamber of Commerce, and America’s warmongering Neo-Con establishment care about promoting democracy in Malaysia? Or in expanding their corporate-financier interests in Asia under the guise of promoting democracy? Clearly the latter.

The NDI, which Bersih leader Ambiga Sreenevasan herself admits funds her organization, is likewise chaired by an unsavory collection of corporate interests.

The average Malaysian, disenfranchised with the ruling government as they may be, cannot possibly believe these people are funding and propping up clearly disingenuous NGOs in direct support of a compromised Anwar Ibrahim, for the best interests of Malaysia.The end game for the US with an Anwar Ibrahim/People’s Alliance-led government, is a Malaysia that capitulates to both US free trade schemes and US foreign policy. In Malaysia’s case, this will leave the extensive economic independence achieved since escaping out from under British rule, gutted, while the nation’s resources are steered away from domestic development and toward a proxy confrontation with China, just as is already being done in Korea, Japan, and the Philippines.

A quick look at NED’s board of directors reveals a milieu of corporate-fascists and warmongers:

1. William Galston – Brookings Institution.
2. Moises Naim - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
3. Robert Miller – corporate lawyer.
4. Larry Liebenow - US Chamber of Commerce (a chief proponent of SOPA, ACTA, and CISPA), Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE).
5. Anne-Marie Slaughter - US State Department, Council on Foreign Relations (corporate members here), director of Citigroup, McDonald’s Corporation, and Political Strategies Advisory Group.
6. Richard Gephardt - US Representative, Boeing lobbyist, Goldman Sachs, Visa, Ameren Corp, and Waste Management Inc lobbyist, corporate consultant, consultant & now director of Ford Motor Company, supporter of the military invasion and occupation of Iraq in 2003.
7. Marilyn Carlson Nelson – CEO of Carlson, director of Exxon Mobil.
8. Stephen Sestanovich - US State Department, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, CFR.
9. Judy Shelton – director of Hilton Hotels Corporation & Atlantic Coast Airlines.
10. Francis Fukuyama - Neo-Con, pro-war, pro-hegmonic PNAC signatory
11. Zalmay Khalilzad - Neo-Con, pro-war, pro-hegmonic PNAC signatory
12. Will Marshall - Neo-Con, pro-war, pro-hegmonic PNAC signatory
13. Vin Weber - Neo-Con, pro-war, pro-hegmonic PNAC signatory

Before all of the names above are erased; here’s the evidence of proof;

Does Boeing, Goldman Sachs, Exxon, the SOPA, ACTA, CISPA-sponsoring US Chamber of Commerce, and America’s warmongering Neo-Con establishment care about promoting democracy in Malaysia? Or in expanding their corporate-financier interests in Asia under the guise of promoting democracy? Clearly the latter.

The NDI, which Bersih leader Ambiga Sreenevasan herself admits funds her organization, is likewise chaired by an unsavory collection of corporate fascist interests.

Some select members include:

Robin Carnahan: Formally of the Export-Import Bank of the United States where she “explored innovative ways to help American companies increase their sale of goods and services abroad.” The NDI’s meddling in foreign nations, particularly in elections on behalf of pro-West candidates favoring free-trade, and Carnahan’s previous ties to a bank that sought to expand corporate interests overseas constitutes an alarming conflict of interests.

Richard Blum: An investment banker with Blum Capital, CB Richard Ellis. Engaged in war profiteering along side the Neo-Con infested Carlyle Group, when both acquired shares in EG&G which was then awarded a $600 million military contract during the opening phases of the Iraq invasion.

Bernard W. Aronson:  Founder of ACON Investments. Prior to that, he was an adviser to Goldman Sachs, and serves on the boards of directors of Fifth & Pacific Companies, Royal Caribbean International, Hyatt Hotels Corporation, and Chroma Oil & Gas, Northern Tier Energy. Aronson is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) which in turn represents the collective interests of some of the largest corporations on Earth.

Sam Gejdenson: NDI’s profile claims Gejdenson is “in charge of”  Sam Gejdenson International, which proclaims on its website “Commerce Without Borders,” or in other words, big-business monopolies via free-trade. In his autobiographical profile, he claims to have promoted US exports as a Democrat on the House International Relations Committee. Here is yet another case of conflicting interests between NDI’s meddling in foreign politics and board members previously involved in “promoting US exports.”

Nancy H. Rubin: CFR member.

Vali Nasr: CFR member and a senior fellow at the big-oil, big-banker Belfer Center at Harvard.

Rich Verma: A partner in the Washington office of Steptoe & Johnson LLP – an international corporate and governmental legal firm representing for Verma, a multitude of conflicting interests and potential improprieties. Setptoe & Johnson is active in many of the nations the NDI is operating in, opening the door for manipulation on both sides to favor the other.

Lynda Thomas: A private investor, formally a senior manager/CPA at Deloitte Haskins & Sells in New York, and Coopers & Lybrand Deloitte in London. Among her clients were international banks.

Maurice Tempelsman: Chairman of the board of directors of Lazare Kaplan International Inc., the largest cutter and polisher of “ideal cut” diamonds in the United States. Also senior partner at Leon Tempelsman & Son, involved in mining, investments and business development and minerals trading in Europe, Russia, Africa, Latin America, Canada and Asia. Yet another immense potential for conflicting interests, where Tempelsman stands to directly gain financially and politically by manipulating foreign governments via the NDI.

Elaine K. Shocas: President of Madeleine Albright, Inc., a private investment firm. She was chief of staff to the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Mission to the United Nations during Madeleine Albright’s tenure as Secretary of State and Ambassador to the United Nation, illustrating a particularly dizzying “revolving door” between big-government and big-business.

Madeleine K. Albright: Chair of Albright Stonebridge Group and Chair of Albright Capital Management LLC, an investment advisory firm – directly affiliated with fellow NDI board member Elaine Shocas, representing an incestuous business/government relationship with overt conflicts of interest. Albright infamously stated that sanctions against Iraq which directly led to the starvation and death of half a million children “was worth it.”

The average Malaysian, disenfranchised with the ruling government as they may be, cannot possibly believe these people are funding and propping up clearly disingenuous NGOs in direct support of a compromised Anwar Ibrahim, for the best interests of Malaysia.

The end game for the US with an Anwar Ibrahim/People’s Alliance-led government, is a Malaysia that capitulates to both US free trade schemes and US foreign policy. In Malaysia’s case, this will leave the extensive economic independence achieved since escaping out from under British rule, gutted, while the nation’s resources are steered away from domestic development and toward a proxy confrontation with China, just as is already being done in Korea, Japan, and the Philippines.

Stitching ASEAN Together with Proxy Regimes to Fight China

Image: Lemuel Gulliver on the island of Lilliput, having been overtaken while asleep by ropes and stakes by the diminutive but numerous Lilliputians. Western corporate-financier interests envision organizing Southeast Asia into a supranational bloc, ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations), to use the smaller nations as a combined front to “tie down” China in a similar manner. Unlike in the story “Gulliver’s Travels,” China may well break free of its binds and stomp the Lilliputian leaders flat for their belligerence.

That the US goal is to use Malaysia and other Southeast Asian nations against China is not merely speculation. It is the foundation of a long-documented conspiracy dating back as far as 1997, and reaffirmed by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as recently as 2011.

The present world order serves the needs of the United States and its allies, which constructed it – Robert Kagan, 1997

In 1997,  Fortune 500-funded Brookings Institution policy scribe Robert Kagan penned, “What China Knows That We Don’t: The Case for a New Strategy of Containment,” which spells out the policy Wall Street and London were already in the process of implementing even then, albeit in a somewhat more nebulous manner. In his essay, Kagan literally states (emphasis added):

The present world order serves the needs of the United States and its allies, which constructed it. And it is poorly suited to the needs of a Chinese dictatorship trying to maintain power at home and increase its clout abroad. Chinese leaders chafe at the constraints on them and worry that they must change the rules of the international system before the international system changes them.

Here, Kagan openly admits that the “world order,” or the “international order,” is simply American-run global hegemony, dictated by US interests. These interests, it should be kept in mind, are not those of the American people, but of the immense corporate-financier interests of the Anglo-American establishment. Kagan continues (emphasis added):

In truth, the debate over whether we should or should not contain China is a bit silly. We are already containing China — not always consciously and not entirely successfully, but enough to annoy Chinese leaders and be an obstacle to their ambitions. When the Chinese used military maneuvers and ballistic-missile tests last March to intimidate Taiwanese voters, the United States responded by sending the Seventh Fleet. By this show of force, the U.S. demonstrated to Taiwan, Japan, and the rest of our Asian allies that our role as their defender in the region had not diminished as much as they might have feared. Thus, in response to a single Chinese exercise of muscle, the links of containment became visible and were tightened.

The new China hands insist that the United States needs to explain to the Chinese that its goal is merely, as [Robert] Zoellick writes, to avoid “the domination of East Asia by any power or group of powers hostile to the United States.” Our treaties with Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, and Australia, and our naval and military forces in the region, aim only at regional stability, not aggressive encirclement.

But the Chinese understand U.S. interests perfectly well, perhaps better than we do. While they welcome the U.S. presence as a check on Japan, the nation they fear most, they can see clearly that America’s military and diplomatic efforts in the region severely limit their own ability to become the region’s hegemon. According to Thomas J. Christensen, who spent several months interviewing Chinese military and civilian government analysts, Chinese leaders worry that they will “play Gulliver to Southeast Asia’s Lilliputians, with the United States supplying the rope and stakes.”

Indeed, the United States blocks Chinese ambitions merely by supporting what we like to call “international norms” of behavior. Christensen points out that Chinese strategic thinkers consider “complaints about China’s violations of international norms” to be part of “an integrated Western strategy, led by Washington, to prevent China from becoming a great power.

What Kagan is talking about is maintaining American preeminence across all of Asia and producing a strategy of tension to divide and limit the power of any single player vis-a-vis Wall Street and London’s hegemony. Kagan would continue (emphasis added):
The changes in the external and internal behavior of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s resulted at least in part from an American strategy that might be called “integration through containment and pressure for change.”

Such a strategy needs to be applied to China today. As long as China maintains its present form of government, it cannot be peacefully integrated into the international order. For China’s current leaders, it is too risky to play by our rules — yet our unwillingness to force them to play by our rules is too risky for the health of the international order. The United States cannot and should not be willing to upset the international order in the mistaken belief that accommodation is the best way to avoid a confrontation with China.

We should hold the line instead and work for political change in Beijing. That means strengthening our military capabilities in the region, improving our security ties with friends and allies, and making clear that we will respond, with force if necessary, when China uses military intimidation or aggression to achieve its regional ambitions. It also means not trading with the Chinese military or doing business with firms the military owns or operates. And it means imposing stiff sanctions when we catch China engaging in nuclear proliferation.

A successful containment strategy will require increasing, not decreasing, our overall defense capabilities. Eyre Crowe warned in 1907 that “the more we talk of the necessity of economising on our armaments, the more firmly will the Germans believe that we are tiring of the struggle, and that they will win by going on.” Today, the perception of our military decline is already shaping Chinese calculations. In 1992, an internal Chinese government document said that America’s “strength is in relative decline and that there are limits to what it can do.” This perception needs to be dispelled as quickly as possible.

Kagan’s talk of “responding” to China’s expansion is clearly manifested today in a series of proxy conflicts growing between US-backed Japan, and the US-backed Philippines, and to a lesser extent between North and South Korea, and even beginning to show in Myanmar. The governments of these nations have capitulated to US interests and their eagerness to play the role of America’s proxies in the region, even at their own cost, is not a surprise. To expand this, however, the US fully plans on integrating Southeast Asia, installing proxy regimes, and likewise turning their resources and people against China.

In 2011, then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton unveiled the capstone to Kagan’s 1997 conspiracy. She published in Foreign Policy magazine, a piece titled, “America’s Pacific Century” where she explicitly states:

In the next 10 years, we need to be smart and systematic about where we invest time and energy, so that we put ourselves in the best position to sustain our leadership, secure our interests, and advance our values. One of the most important tasks of American statecraft over the next decade will therefore be to lock in a substantially increased investment — diplomatic, economic, strategic, and otherwise — in the Asia-Pacific region.

To “sustain our leadership,” “secure our interests,” and “advance our values,” are clearly hegemonic statements, and indicates that the US’ goal for “substantially increased investment,” including buying off NGOs and opposition parties in Malaysia, seeks to directly serve US leadership, interests, and “values,”  not within US borders, but outside them, and specifically across all of Asia.

Clinton continues:

At a time when the region is building a more mature security and economic architecture to promote stability and prosperity, U.S. commitment there is essential. It will help build that architecture and pay dividends for continued American leadership well into this century, just as our post-World War II commitment to building a comprehensive and lasting transatlantic network of institutions and relationships has paid off many times over — and continues to do so.

The “architecture” referred to is the supranational ASEAN bloc – and again Clinton confirms that the US’ commitment to this process is designed not to lift up Asia, but to maintain its own hegemony across the region, and around the world.

Clinton then openly admits that the US seeks to exploit Asia’s economic growth:

Harnessing Asia’s growth and dynamism is central to American economic and strategic interests and a key priority for President Obama. Open markets in Asia provide the United States with unprecedented opportunities for investment, trade, and access to cutting-edge technology. Our economic recovery at home will depend on exports and the ability of American firms to tap into the vast and growing consumer base of Asia.

Of course, the purpose of an economy is to meet the needs of those who live within it. The Asian economy therefore ought to serve the needs and interests of Asians – not a hegemonic empire on the other side of the Pacific. Clinton’s piece could easily double as a declaration by England’s King George and his intentions toward emptying out the New World.

And no empire is complete without establishing a permanent military garrison on newly claimed territory. Clinton explains (emphasis added):

With this in mind, our work will proceed along six key lines of action: strengthening bilateral security alliances; deepening our working relationships with emerging powers, including with China; engaging with regional multilateral institutions; expanding trade and investment; forging a broad-based military presence; and advancing democracy and human rights.

And of course, by “advancing democracy and human rights,” Clinton means the continuation of funding faux-NGOs that disingenuously leverage human rights and democracy promotion to politically undermine targeted governments in pursuit of installing more obedient proxy regimes.

The piece is lengthy, and while a lot of readers may be tempted to gloss over some of the uglier, overtly imperial aspects of Clinton’s statement, the proof of America’s true intentions in Asia can be seen clearly manifested today, with the intentional encouragement of provocations between North and South Korea, an expanding confrontation between China and US proxies, Japan and the Philippines, and with mobs taking to the streets in Malaysia in hopes of overturning an election US-proxy Anwar Ibrahim had no chance of winning.

Clean & Fair Elections?

While the battle cry for Anwar Ibrahim, his People’s Alliance, and Bersih have been “clean and fair elections,” in reality, allegations of fraud began long before the elections even started. This was not because Anwar’s opposition party had evidence of such fraud – instead, this was to implant the idea into people’s minds long before the elections, deeply enough to justify claims of stolen elections no matter how the polls eventually turned out.

At one point during the elections, before ballots were even counted, Anwar Ibrahim declared victory – a move that analysts across the region noted was provocative, dangerous, and incredibly irresponsible. Again, there could not have been any evidence that Anwar won, because ballots had not yet been counted. It was again a move meant to manipulate the public and set the stage for contesting Anwar’s inevitable loss – in the streets with mobs and chaos in typical Western-backed color revolution style.

One must seriously ask themselves, considering Anwar’s foreign backers, those backers’ own stated intentions for Asia, and Anwar’s irresponsible, baseless claims before, during, and after the elections – what is “clean and fair” about any of this?

Anwar Ibrahim is a fraud, an overt proxy of foreign interests. His satellite NGOs, including the insidious Bersih movement openly funded by foreign corporate-financier interests, and the equally insidious polling NGO Merdeka who portrays itself as “independent” despite being funded directly by a foreign government, are likewise frauds – drawing in well-intentioned people through slick marketing, just as cigarette companies do.

And like cigarette companies who sell what is for millions essentially a slow, painful, humiliating death sentence that will leave one broken financially and spiritually before ultimately outright killing them, Anwar’s US-backed opposition is also selling Malaysia a slow, painful, humiliating death. Unfortunately, also like cigarettes, well-intentioned but impressionable people have not gathered all of the facts, and have instead have based their support on only the marketing, gimmicks, slogans, and tricks of a well-oiled, manipulative political machine.

For that folly, Malaysia may pay a heavy price one day – but for Anwar and his opposition party today, they have lost the elections, and the cheap veneer of America’s “democracy promotion” racket is quickly peeling away. For now, America has tripped in mid-pivot toward its hegemonic agenda in Asia, with Malaysia’s ruling government providing a model for other nations in the region to follow, should they be interested in sovereignty and independent progress – no matter how flawed or slow it may be.

Malaysia may not enjoying these prices (below) if George Soros and US won its mastery game conquering through Anwar Ibrahim and BERSIH campaign. It’s time to restore the peace in Malaysia. Those Malaysians who are still sleeping please adopt reality check!  Lesson to learn – George Soros thinks every Malaysians can be bought like Anwar Ibrahim and Ambiga; most Malaysians are stupid like the PKR supporters.

Key to encircling and containing China, US sets proxies in motion for color revolution in Malaysian streets

US-proxy Anwar Ibrahim leads a Bersih rally in Malaysia. While Bersih has attempted to claim it is “independent” and simply pursusing “fair and clean elections,” it is clearly a vehicle for returning Anwar Ibrahim back into power. Additionally, Bersih shares the same ties to the US State Department’s National Endowment for Democracy (NED) as its crypto-leader Anwar Ibrahim – representing a dangerous and seditious conflict of interest.

May 15, 2013 (AltThaiNews) – US-funded opposition fronts have vowed to overthrow the Malaysian government via disruptive and potentially violent street protests in the wake of general elections that saw their leader Anwar Ibrahim soundly defeated despite massive support from Western media, NGOs, and direct government intervention. Free Malaysia Today (FMT) reported in their article, “‘BN will be toppled this year’,” that:

Pro-Pakatan Rakyat groups have vowed to overthrow the Barisan Nasional government this year through a massive street rally.

Speakers at a forum held yesterday unanimously agreed that waiting for five years until the next general election was too long, and vowed to overthrow BN this year through “force”.

FMT also added that:

Electoral watchdog group Bersih 2.0 steering committee member  Hishamuddin Rais pointed out that it was useless to take their unhappiness to the courts as he claimed the justice system was being controlled by the government.

“That is why we must take to the streets. We have to come out. What Najib likes is wrong, and what he doesn’t like is what we have to do,” he said.

“We will mobilise a big group and rally on the streets. This is not a threat, this is a promise,” he stressed.

Bersih, of course, is a US State Department-funded opposition front aimed to bolster US-proxy candidate Anwar Ibrahim, formerly of the IMF and World Bank, and a frequent visitor to the insidious National Endowment for Democracy (NED) in Washington D.C. It is in fact, NED that funds Bersih through its subsidiary, the National Democratic Institute (NDI).

The Malaysian Insider reported on June 27, 2011 that Bersih leader Ambiga Sreenevassan:

“…admitted to Bersih receiving some money from two US organisations — the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and Open Society Institute (OSI) — for other projects, which she stressed were unrelated to the July 9 march.”

A visit to the NDI website revealed indeed that funding and training had been provided by the US organization – before NDI took down the information and replaced it with a more benign version purged entirely of any mention of Bersih. For funding Ambiga claims is innocuous, the NDI’s rushed obfuscation of any ties to her organization suggests something far more sinister at play.

Photo: NDI’s website before taking down any mention to Malaysia’s Bersih movement.

In addition to Bersih, other faux-electoral monitors are also directly funded by the US government. While the Western media attempts to portray such organizations as “independent,” the Merdeka Center for Opinion Research, for example, is likewise funded directly by the US through NED.

Anwar Ibrahim himself was Chairman of the Development Committee of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 1998, held lecturing positions at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, was a consultant to the World Bank, and a panelist at the Neo-Con lined National Endowment for Democracy’s “Democracy Award” and a panelist at a NED donation ceremony – the very same US organization funding and supporting Bersih and so-called “independent” election monitor Merdeka – paints a picture of an opposition running for office in Malaysia, not for the Malaysian people, but clearly for the corporate financier interests of Wall Street and London.

Photo: Taken from the US National Endowment for Democracy’s 2007 Democracy Award event held in Washington D.C., Anwar Ibrahim can be seen to the far left and participated as a “panelist.” It is no surprise that NED is now subsidizing his bid to worm his way back into power in Malaysia.

Without a doubt, this premeditated sedition aimed at Malaysia’s ruling government has been designed, funded, and directed from Washington on behalf of Wall Street and London, not by the Malaysian people on behalf of Malaysia’s best interests.

The street protests conducted by Bersih have all the hallmarks of US-backed “color revolutions,” and this recent attempt to overturn election results that do not favor an overt US-proxy, foreshadows the same destructive, divisive, violent, and regressive unrest that has plagued Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, and Syria after US-engineered uprisings have left each in turn destabilized, failed states overrun by extremists, dictators, and traitors many times worse than the governments activists sought to overthrow.

And with Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, and Syria in hindsight, will Malaysians fall into this same familiar trap? Whatever discontent Malaysians may have with the current government, it is all but assured Bersih and US-proxy candidate Anwar Ibrahim will compound perceived injustices while compromising Malaysia’s political, social, and economic stability, and begin channeling Malaysia’s resources and energy toward foreign interests and designs, particularly those involving the encirclement and containment of China.

An Alternative to the Tired Ploy of “Street Protests”

For the average Malaysian seeking progress, a better bet than joining US-funded sedition would be to turn their attention toward organizing locally and focusing on pragmatic, rather than political, goals. Education, local economic development, health, and local infrastructure are all areas Malaysians, regardless of political affiliations, can work together on and improve regardless of who holds public office.

And while special interests, both foreign and domestic, can indeed hinder such progress, they do not make such progress impossible. What is certain, is that corruption amongst Malaysia’s ruling party pales in comparison to that of Wall Street and London – and Malaysians will place themselves in the path of guaranteed destruction by inviting in the very people who dominated them before achieving a hard-won independence.

Democracy, in reality, is supposed to be a bottom-up exercise drawn from the grassroots. Bersih is clearly a vehicle for Anwar Ibrahim and his political machine – one whose message is funded, crafted, and declared from Anwar’s political advisers and foreign backers, and disseminated across the movement – however cleverly “democratized” Bersih may attempt to appear.

Malaysians do not need a political party to improve education, to grow their own food, to develop business locally by leveraging technology, or to improve local infrastructure and strengthen local communities. The time being wasted to assist Anwar Ibrahim’s worming back into political power at the cost of peace, stability, and prosperity could be better spent developing truly grassroots pragmatic power.

Real revolutions do not happen out on the streets – they are manifested in our schools, across industry, and within our communities. They are marked by pragmatism and true, enduring technological and socioeconomic progress – none of which are even promised by Bersih and Anwar Ibrahim’s “People’s Alliance.”

If the people of Malaysia truly want “change,” they are going to have to do it themselves by building local institutions that technologically and pragmatically solve real problems rather than simply craft slogans and campaign promises that merely pander to the concerns of the people. Following the flags of Bersih into the streets will  undoubtedly begin instability and division across Malaysian society that will jeopardize, not spur, real and very necessary pragmatic progress.

AirAsia has SHEMALE Cabin Crew!

Sir Richard Branson; the owner of Virgin Group had become the first SHEMALE Cabin Crew for AirAsia X. He has cross-dressed from a Gentleman to an ugly Shemale Cabin Crew in AirAsia’s red uniform and with heavy make-up. We presumed he has pathological implication of gender and became the first shemale Cabin Crew ever found on this planet.

Oh Gosh! Look at him..he’s neither male nor female. Richard – you are very offensive to the sense of beauty  in this red uniform and heavy make-up!

Richard Branson had operated AirAsia X’s Perth flight to Kuala Lumpur and had served AirAsiaX’s passengers including the fatty CEO (budget) – Tony Fernandez. On that same flight; Richard Branson were weathered in because of the jet streams but he took the opportunity spilling drinks on Tony Fernandez where later Richard was fired before the flight landed into Kuala Lumpur LCCT.

AirAsia sets Downstraight Zero Compassion Policy!

Yesterday AirAsia X – AK1455 from Ho Chi Minh to Kuala Lumpur abandoned two of the passengers citing an infant has chicken pox condition which under AirAsiaX’s policy it is prohibited for the mother and the baby to boarding the airplane.

A regular doctor traveling as passenger announced to AirAsia’s ground staff of the baby’s condition that is safe for traveling had fallen on deaf ears.  AirAsia’s ground staff continued acting as medical personnel and had the mother and her child quarantined; grounded in Ho Chi Minh city for another 5 days. Below is the statement from its CEO – Aireen Omar.

A very unfortunate encounter with AirAsiaX for this family. Twelve (12) members of this family traveled by AirAsiaX to Ho Chi Minh city but only ten (10) members were allowed to board AK1455 returning home to Kuala Lumpur. The mother and her child were abandoned by AirAsia’s ground staff cited the aviation policy prohibited from carrying a passenger with infectious condition.

Is this necessary?

And what Tony Fernandez say about this?

If really following the book; AirAsia’s plane should have been overhauled every 30 days instead of every 45 days which AirAsia is presently practicing. Heyy..Tony Bastard; stop being so inhumane to your fellow own Malaysians.

The National Carrier – Malaysia Airlines have extended assistance to the mother and her infant above on a compassionate ground. Now Everyone Knows AirAsia is Brutal!

Stay tuned to Malaysiaairlinesfamilies and we’ll be back for more stories on MAS stupid middle management!